Ah so it's race wide but not gender wide, because attacking half of humanity for your sexual frustration is a-ok, but discussing the actual humans that actually own x, y, z, well less than 2% the population, is blaming an entire race for a racewide conspilpul pilpul pilpul pilpul and therefore banned
Oh AND you're an evil stormcuck! Yes, from our "name blame and hate literally half of humanity" moral high chair, we look down our noses at you dirty "angry at the actual actions of the actual owner" scum and your dirty >2%-blamer ways! These "you can just literally look up their names lmao" stormcucks have no moral or intellectual standing!
Interestingly enough, the effect is apparent in plain sight here. A user who represents less than 2% of this forum considers himself the owner, maintains a system of entirely personal ethnicity driven preference, and would rather you blame something like 50%of the users for discussing plain reality.
Also, this one guy (I think it's just him, here?) is gonna become more odious as his tribe loses the war on the internet proper, eventually bringing you to Great Awakening levels of cringe and policing in order to maintain the political narratives they selectively manufacture, unless it is all forcibly eschewed by some populist mechanism.
oh uh, all the above an individual basis, tho, of course, in accordance to the rule
For the sheer amount of shit he keeps on spamming he'd be banned anywhere.
It doesn't even matter if his obsession is women.
If hotdogs were his thing and he replied every thread talking about how hotdogs are awesome, with several replies, frequently derailing threads into hotdog discussion, he would still be banned anywhere. What he does is nothing more than spamming.
One thing I've noticed in many political/personality/drama/identity forums is that a village idiot is often tolerated to give the other members a communal punching bag. Impy is more monotonous spam than idiot, but his un-nuanced monocausal obsession crosses the duncehat threshold. I don't pay close attention here 75% of the year, but I haven't noticed any other persistent derailers. Tolerating blatantly IQ-damaging commentators who don't outright break rules will sink any community.
Ah so it's race wide but not gender wide, because attacking half of humanity for your sexual frustration is a-ok, but discussing the actual humans that actually own x, y, z, well less than 2% the population, is blaming an entire race for a racewide conspilpul pilpul pilpul pilpul and therefore banned
Oh AND you're an evil stormcuck! Yes, from our "name blame and hate literally half of humanity" moral high chair, we look down our noses at you dirty "angry at the actual actions of the actual owner" scum and your dirty >2%-blamer ways! These "you can just literally look up their names lmao" stormcucks have no moral or intellectual standing!
Interestingly enough, the effect is apparent in plain sight here. A user who represents less than 2% of this forum considers himself the owner, maintains a system of entirely personal ethnicity driven preference, and would rather you blame something like 50%of the users for discussing plain reality.
Also, this one guy (I think it's just him, here?) is gonna become more odious as his tribe loses the war on the internet proper, eventually bringing you to Great Awakening levels of cringe and policing in order to maintain the political narratives they selectively manufacture, unless it is all forcibly eschewed by some populist mechanism.
oh uh, all the above an individual basis, tho, of course, in accordance to the rule
For the sheer amount of shit he keeps on spamming he'd be banned anywhere.
It doesn't even matter if his obsession is women.
If hotdogs were his thing and he replied every thread talking about how hotdogs are awesome, with several replies, frequently derailing threads into hotdog discussion, he would still be banned anywhere. What he does is nothing more than spamming.
One thing I've noticed in many political/personality/drama/identity forums is that a village idiot is often tolerated to give the other members a communal punching bag. Impy is more monotonous spam than idiot, but his un-nuanced monocausal obsession crosses the duncehat threshold. I don't pay close attention here 75% of the year, but I haven't noticed any other persistent derailers. Tolerating blatantly IQ-damaging commentators who don't outright break rules will sink any community.