Say I say that I don't like that the Gays control the world? Is that banworthy? What if I say I don't like that the Jews control the world?
Both are rule violations for the same exact reason. These statements aren't different.
Context clues are not mind reading. And I don't care that you don't care. I'm not going to willfully chose to be ignorant. I know what words mean, and I know that an ideology has tenets. I'm not going to pretend that: "We should kill every fucking nigger" isn't really what the writer means unless he explicitly tells me what he means by "kill" "every" and "nigger". I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear. I will not blind and deafen myself to reality. Sometimes I do directly ask, but I still have to decide whether or not they are lying to me; rather than just assuming that everything said to me is the God's Honest Truth.
I get that you don't want Rule 16 to exist at all. That in and of itself could be a fine argument. But "you shouldn't read context" isn't ever a reasonable criticism.
Both are rule violations for the same exact reason.
Well, I don't like the disproportionate influence Jews, Gays, Women, Americans, Zionists, Globalists, or Blacks have. Simple as.
Context clues are not mind reading.
Perhaps, but it's still a terrible basis for moderation.
And I don't care that you don't care. I'm not going to willfully chose to be ignorant.
There you go again. I'm not asking you to be "ignorant" or "retarded," I'm telling you to stop be a censorious and nonsensical jannie, when there's no reason. If this was Reddit, sure, do those things to dodge the damn admins. But we're not on Reddit.
I know what words mean, and I know that an ideology has tenets.
Congrats. You're still reading things into it that aren't always there, and that's not fair, and that's not free speech.
R16 is a stupid rule, and always will be.
I'm not going to pretend that: "We should kill every fucking nigger" isn't really what the writer means unless he explicitly tells me what he means by "kill" "every" and "nigger".
Once again going off topic, yay.
I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear. I will not blind and deafen myself to reality.
Oh just stop.
...I still have to decide whether or not they are lying to me
NO. You have to decide whether or not they're BREAKING THE RULES.
Both are rule violations for the same exact reason. These statements aren't different.
Context clues are not mind reading. And I don't care that you don't care. I'm not going to willfully chose to be ignorant. I know what words mean, and I know that an ideology has tenets. I'm not going to pretend that: "We should kill every fucking nigger" isn't really what the writer means unless he explicitly tells me what he means by "kill" "every" and "nigger". I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear. I will not blind and deafen myself to reality. Sometimes I do directly ask, but I still have to decide whether or not they are lying to me; rather than just assuming that everything said to me is the God's Honest Truth.
I get that you don't want Rule 16 to exist at all. That in and of itself could be a fine argument. But "you shouldn't read context" isn't ever a reasonable criticism.
Well, I don't like the disproportionate influence Jews, Gays, Women, Americans, Zionists, Globalists, or Blacks have. Simple as.
Perhaps, but it's still a terrible basis for moderation.
There you go again. I'm not asking you to be "ignorant" or "retarded," I'm telling you to stop be a censorious and nonsensical jannie, when there's no reason. If this was Reddit, sure, do those things to dodge the damn admins. But we're not on Reddit.
Congrats. You're still reading things into it that aren't always there, and that's not fair, and that's not free speech.
R16 is a stupid rule, and always will be.
Once again going off topic, yay.
Oh just stop.
NO. You have to decide whether or not they're BREAKING THE RULES.
Context and lying to me are all part of that.