Redundancy in law starts to occur when existing laws aren't being properly enforced.
Also when the problem the law attempts to address isn't actually the problem. And we have a lot of that right now.
Example: gun control. Gun laws are stricter than they've ever been in the history of this country, yet gun crime continues to rise. The response? More gun control. So they make guns harder to get. And gun crime continues to rise. And somehow, the response is, yet again, more gun control. Nothing ever gets solved because the new laws don't actually do anything, but people are single-minded sheep, so they just keep stacking redundant laws on top of one another, forever. "Surely," they think, "we're just one more gun control law away from fixing the world forever".
Also when the problem the law attempts to address isn't actually the problem. And we have a lot of that right now.
Example: gun control. Gun laws are stricter than they've ever been in the history of this country, yet gun crime continues to rise. The response? More gun control. So they make guns harder to get. And gun crime continues to rise. And somehow, the response is, yet again, more gun control. Nothing ever gets solved because the new laws don't actually do anything, but people are single-minded sheep, so they just keep stacking redundant laws on top of one another, forever. "Surely," they think, "we're just one more gun control law away from fixing the world forever".
It is their best option.
Keep street crime rampant, so that political crimes can continue.
Remove any means of protection against street crime, that coincidentally will also remove any means for the plebs to hold the politicians responsible.