I tried finding an answer but it's a convoluted and obscure mess whose primary purpose is more bureaucracy.
On the one hand they mention "security personnel" as a way to address violence. On the other hand I didn't see anything that makes them exempt from the requirements. Seems a bit schizophrenic.
does this include employees explicitly hired a security? if so this is beyond retarded, but what's new with California legislation.
Here's the proposed bill: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB553
I tried finding an answer but it's a convoluted and obscure mess whose primary purpose is more bureaucracy.
On the one hand they mention "security personnel" as a way to address violence. On the other hand I didn't see anything that makes them exempt from the requirements. Seems a bit schizophrenic.