It's the establishment right whom have been allied with the same progressive narrative as the Democrats since the early Progressive era in the late 1800's. But your faction isn't any better because it is still operating within the Progressive narrative framework.
Your faction is not external to a Leftist narrative. It is just White Socialism. If you were a monarchist, your narrative would sound like "We need kings to oppress the poor and individual liberty. True freedom comes from servitude to a king". That's a heel position within a Leftwing narrative. The correct monarchist position would be: "We need an aristocracy of statesmen to limit the abuse of government and make specific individuals accountable for the benefit of society and their subjects."
What's wrong the Confederate flag?
When it's being used in Canada next to a Swastika? Pretty much everything. Literally no part of that makes sense unless your intention is to communicate with the Left. It's like when someone starts talking about "Libertarian Fascism". That concept is purely built within Leftist political narratives that no Liberal, Libertarian, or even Fascist would agree to.
You didn't say anything about the Confederate flag being in Canada, but even still, I could see an American southerner employing it in Canada under certain context though it is a bit odd.
Libertarian Fascism
That makes no sense to me, but you consider fascism to be leftist. Libertarianism was created by leftists so I don't see the contradiction from your perspective.
The point is that it has no place in Canada (or frankly the American north), except as an effort to say: "Look at me: everyone around me is the bad guy. I'm totally not a fed."
Fascism is Leftist. It is the final, practical, application of Rousseauian "Liberalism".
Libertarianism is merely an extension of Lockean Liberalism.
Because Rousseau is a lunatic, Rousseauian Liberalism is so diametrically opposed to the basic tenets of Liberalism, as such Lockean Liberalism is diametrically opposed to it. A Lockean system explicitly opposes governmental tyranny. Rousseauian Liberalism demands a reign of terror by the state in order to compel all individuals into "The General Will". Rousseau is trying turn each person into a mere husk of the state, where they will be "free" as an abstraction; whereas Locke (and basically all other forms of Liberalism) are attempting to free people from the tyranny of a state.
The people who invented the term "Leftist" were the Jacobins in the French revolution. It was a reference to their coalition that literally sat on the left side of the legislative body; and the ruling philosophy of the Jacobin's coalition was that of Rousseau, as if Rousseau was a prophet. They caused the Reign Of Terror in France because Rousseau believed it was a categorical imperative to terrorize the population into compliance with the state as part of his concept of a Social Contract. Once "the General Will" has been established in the state, no individual has a right to dissent. This is why the Lockeans were systematically hunted by the Rousseauism. The Lockeans wanted freedom from tyranny, which means that the Rousseauians needed to kill them all because tyranny was an absolute moral good. The Lockeans were not even "Rightists" (people who sat on the right side of the legislative body and opposed the Jacobins), they were driven from government and society altogether because they were Liberal. Leftists (Rosseauians) do not adhere to any concept of Liberalism except a vague notion of liberating people from "oppression", and for some reason, a guillotine isn't oppressive. Leftists are anti-Liberal. They will still explain that to you if you ask.
Lockean Liberals literally aren't Leftist, were not created by Leftists, and were (and still are) hunted by Leftists. This is because they are Liberals, and Leftists are not.
Fascism is literally "Trade Unionism". However, it is best to think of it as Civic National State Syndicalist Totalitarianism. All of these ideas are left-wing, and almost all of them can be traced back to Rousseau. Syndicalism is a Leftwing economic theory, that starts as Anachro-Syndicalism in Spain, but Mussolini (an ardent socialist) adopts it to an organized political structure, so that the labor movements, corporations, and state can be harmonized with the "will of the people". This is why the state is deified in Fascism. The state is the will of the people through time, and the people are the current manifestation of the state and it is all harmonized through the political party.
Again, you didn't start with an example of a Confederate flag being used in a strange place. I still don't think it's a big deal that it is. Right-wingers who aren't obsessed with being "anti-racist" faggots - i.e. you - should have no problem understanding it. You just hate the Confederate flag because "muh racism" but are too cowardly to admit that here.
Libertarianism is merely an extension of Lockean Liberalism.
Why are you using a label invented by leftists then? It's really bizarre. Libertarianism is dog shit anyway and has been ahead of even the Democrats in promoting degeneracy. If you are going to shit on White Nationalism's alleged lack of success, what about libertarianism? At least America has a long history of white identity having mass appeal. Libertarianism has never been popular or accomplished anything other than making the right gayer, more pro-open borders, and pro crime.
It's the establishment right whom have been allied with the same progressive narrative as the Democrats since the early Progressive era in the late 1800's. But your faction isn't any better because it is still operating within the Progressive narrative framework.
Your faction is not external to a Leftist narrative. It is just White Socialism. If you were a monarchist, your narrative would sound like "We need kings to oppress the poor and individual liberty. True freedom comes from servitude to a king". That's a heel position within a Leftwing narrative. The correct monarchist position would be: "We need an aristocracy of statesmen to limit the abuse of government and make specific individuals accountable for the benefit of society and their subjects."
When it's being used in Canada next to a Swastika? Pretty much everything. Literally no part of that makes sense unless your intention is to communicate with the Left. It's like when someone starts talking about "Libertarian Fascism". That concept is purely built within Leftist political narratives that no Liberal, Libertarian, or even Fascist would agree to.
You didn't say anything about the Confederate flag being in Canada, but even still, I could see an American southerner employing it in Canada under certain context though it is a bit odd.
That makes no sense to me, but you consider fascism to be leftist. Libertarianism was created by leftists so I don't see the contradiction from your perspective.
The point is that it has no place in Canada (or frankly the American north), except as an effort to say: "Look at me: everyone around me is the bad guy. I'm totally not a fed."
Fascism is Leftist. It is the final, practical, application of Rousseauian "Liberalism".
Libertarianism is merely an extension of Lockean Liberalism.
Because Rousseau is a lunatic, Rousseauian Liberalism is so diametrically opposed to the basic tenets of Liberalism, as such Lockean Liberalism is diametrically opposed to it. A Lockean system explicitly opposes governmental tyranny. Rousseauian Liberalism demands a reign of terror by the state in order to compel all individuals into "The General Will". Rousseau is trying turn each person into a mere husk of the state, where they will be "free" as an abstraction; whereas Locke (and basically all other forms of Liberalism) are attempting to free people from the tyranny of a state.
The people who invented the term "Leftist" were the Jacobins in the French revolution. It was a reference to their coalition that literally sat on the left side of the legislative body; and the ruling philosophy of the Jacobin's coalition was that of Rousseau, as if Rousseau was a prophet. They caused the Reign Of Terror in France because Rousseau believed it was a categorical imperative to terrorize the population into compliance with the state as part of his concept of a Social Contract. Once "the General Will" has been established in the state, no individual has a right to dissent. This is why the Lockeans were systematically hunted by the Rousseauism. The Lockeans wanted freedom from tyranny, which means that the Rousseauians needed to kill them all because tyranny was an absolute moral good. The Lockeans were not even "Rightists" (people who sat on the right side of the legislative body and opposed the Jacobins), they were driven from government and society altogether because they were Liberal. Leftists (Rosseauians) do not adhere to any concept of Liberalism except a vague notion of liberating people from "oppression", and for some reason, a guillotine isn't oppressive. Leftists are anti-Liberal. They will still explain that to you if you ask.
Lockean Liberals literally aren't Leftist, were not created by Leftists, and were (and still are) hunted by Leftists. This is because they are Liberals, and Leftists are not.
Fascism is literally "Trade Unionism". However, it is best to think of it as Civic National State Syndicalist Totalitarianism. All of these ideas are left-wing, and almost all of them can be traced back to Rousseau. Syndicalism is a Leftwing economic theory, that starts as Anachro-Syndicalism in Spain, but Mussolini (an ardent socialist) adopts it to an organized political structure, so that the labor movements, corporations, and state can be harmonized with the "will of the people". This is why the state is deified in Fascism. The state is the will of the people through time, and the people are the current manifestation of the state and it is all harmonized through the political party.
Again, you didn't start with an example of a Confederate flag being used in a strange place. I still don't think it's a big deal that it is. Right-wingers who aren't obsessed with being "anti-racist" faggots - i.e. you - should have no problem understanding it. You just hate the Confederate flag because "muh racism" but are too cowardly to admit that here.
Why are you using a label invented by leftists then? It's really bizarre. Libertarianism is dog shit anyway and has been ahead of even the Democrats in promoting degeneracy. If you are going to shit on White Nationalism's alleged lack of success, what about libertarianism? At least America has a long history of white identity having mass appeal. Libertarianism has never been popular or accomplished anything other than making the right gayer, more pro-open borders, and pro crime.