You are still doing it. Just spouting off your soapbox rant about a group you don't like without responding to anything posted or said. Clearly they've even got you so mad you skipped even rereading your sentence for grammatical errors.
I thought we were talking about Leftists, I didn't realize you were trying to address me, that's why I didn't respond to challenge you: I agreed with you, and I didn't think I was making "broad generalizations".
Those specific things I mentioned actually happened. BLM literally attacked jews in the street. DeBlasio explicitly targeted the jewish community with extreme Covid measures.
It is absolutely common-place for Leftists to claim ownership of demographics and claim that they, alone, speak for them. This happens all the time: with women, with millentials, with zoomers, with the poor, with the middle class, with the working class, with blacks, with jews, with muslims, etc.
What's the grammar issue you have with my previous reply?
The BLM attacking people in the streets part. Probably the whole, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. The cause or a handful of no names?
What's the grammar issue you have with my previous reply?
Useful Idiots who believe you into the machine guns
You fucked up a word somewhere, hombre.
I thought we were talking about Leftists
The problem with lazily copy/pasting from other threads is that the context is gone. So the assumption from your initial post is that you are calling the Stormfags Leftists for doing things you dislike. In which I was making a joke about how you were doing a very Leftist thing in trying to criticize them.
If I was mistaken in my reading there, then I suppose that's on me.
Its also pretty Leftist to say nothing about the topic beyond using it to springpad dunk on <group I don't like> using very broad generalizations.
The most Leftist thing, to me, is feeding the Useful Idiots who believe you into the machine guns of people defending themselves from your aggression.
That's a very common thread.
You are still doing it. Just spouting off your soapbox rant about a group you don't like without responding to anything posted or said. Clearly they've even got you so mad you skipped even rereading your sentence for grammatical errors.
I thought we were talking about Leftists, I didn't realize you were trying to address me, that's why I didn't respond to challenge you: I agreed with you, and I didn't think I was making "broad generalizations".
Those specific things I mentioned actually happened. BLM literally attacked jews in the street. DeBlasio explicitly targeted the jewish community with extreme Covid measures.
It is absolutely common-place for Leftists to claim ownership of demographics and claim that they, alone, speak for them. This happens all the time: with women, with millentials, with zoomers, with the poor, with the middle class, with the working class, with blacks, with jews, with muslims, etc.
What's the grammar issue you have with my previous reply?
The BLM attacking people in the streets part. Probably the whole, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. The cause or a handful of no names?
You fucked up a word somewhere, hombre.
The problem with lazily copy/pasting from other threads is that the context is gone. So the assumption from your initial post is that you are calling the Stormfags Leftists for doing things you dislike. In which I was making a joke about how you were doing a very Leftist thing in trying to criticize them.
If I was mistaken in my reading there, then I suppose that's on me.