Wait, so IQ research is virtually nonexistent with the convenient exception of methodologically questionable studies that suggest a “very good reason” for Jewish overrepresentation in virtually every institution in the west? No shway Jose!
Asian IQ is higher in all of the empirical disciplines. Jewish “high IQ” largely takes the form of verbal IQ, which is a politically correct way of saying “we excel at manipulating our fellow man”. Best lawyers, etc. I’m speaking from experience here; when I was tested, I excelled in verbal disciplines as well. I sometimes feel like a whistleblower here.
With respect to nations and civilizations, IQ appears to be a threshold. Your people either have sufficient average IQ to create and maintain a functional civilization (Europe) or they don’t (Africa). If you meet the threshold, collectively, then your prize is a prosperous sustainable autonomous nation state.
You shouldn’t be compelled to cede control of your civilization to imported foreign interests simply because they boast a higher IQ; is it the fate of every successful people on earth to inevitably be ruled by high IQ Asians, right?
Substitute “Jews” for “Asians” and that statement is just as valid. Less relevant, though; Asians haven’t been found out and subsequently ejected over 100 times.
And before anyone argues that higher IQ should reliably decide who controls a nation, with no consideration for demographic ownership, realize that you would also be endorsing total control of humanity by artificial intelligence.
The average isn't as important (except "on average", I guess) as the extreme lows dragging everyone else down and the extreme highs trying to hold things together and build an oasis of civilization. And with enough lows then the highs can't really do anything beyond getting as much build wealth as possible to build little forts for their families. This isn't related to your argument about importing high IQ foreigners. Just an observation.
Wait, so IQ research is virtually nonexistent with the convenient exception of methodologically questionable studies that suggest a “very good reason” for Jewish overrepresentation in virtually every institution in the west? No shway Jose!
Asian IQ is higher in all of the empirical disciplines. Jewish “high IQ” largely takes the form of verbal IQ, which is a politically correct way of saying “we excel at manipulating our fellow man”. Best lawyers, etc. I’m speaking from experience here; when I was tested, I excelled in verbal disciplines as well. I sometimes feel like a whistleblower here.
With respect to nations and civilizations, IQ appears to be a threshold. Your people either have sufficient average IQ to create and maintain a functional civilization (Europe) or they don’t (Africa). If you meet the threshold, collectively, then your prize is a prosperous sustainable autonomous nation state.
You shouldn’t be compelled to cede control of your civilization to imported foreign interests simply because they boast a higher IQ; is it the fate of every successful people on earth to inevitably be ruled by high IQ Asians, right?
Substitute “Jews” for “Asians” and that statement is just as valid. Less relevant, though; Asians haven’t been found out and subsequently ejected over 100 times.
And before anyone argues that higher IQ should reliably decide who controls a nation, with no consideration for demographic ownership, realize that you would also be endorsing total control of humanity by artificial intelligence.
The average isn't as important (except "on average", I guess) as the extreme lows dragging everyone else down and the extreme highs trying to hold things together and build an oasis of civilization. And with enough lows then the highs can't really do anything beyond getting as much build wealth as possible to build little forts for their families. This isn't related to your argument about importing high IQ foreigners. Just an observation.