You disapprove of 'bullying' but approve of school shootings. That makes you not an 'easy target', but a nutcase. Apparently, your fellow students recognized that you are a basketcase.
Ah yes, the reasonable response in your scenario, is to attack a psychopath until they fucking kill you.
Goddamn dude, your takes are either brilliant or fucking retarded/attempts to just be a contrarian.
What is this, contrarianism, or are you really fucking dumb enough to trot out "you were bullied and treated like shit because people realized you would kill them for bullying you"?
Because only a fucking troll or retard would sit there and tell me that "I realized poking a tiger would result in me being mauled, so I poked it until it ripped my guts out, because how dare it have the audacity to react to being antagonized".
Imp posted this, so I honestly think that's probably the biggest motivator. Ant always seems to feel compelled to oppose everything and anyone imp supports, even on the rare occasions where imp isn't being hysterical.
Lots of bad blood at this point, everyone has their foibles I guess. 🤷♂️
Ah yes, the reasonable response in your scenario, is to attack a psychopath until they fucking kill you.
Who talked about reasonableness? If someone doesn't judge school shooters, there's clearly something wrong with him. If he then says that he was bullied, then maybe he wasn't as innocent as he's letting on.
What is this, contrarianism, or are you really fucking dumb enough to trot out "you were bullied and treated like shit because people realized you would kill them for bullying you"?
Why not both? Yes, I hold the highly contrarian position that it's bad to judge 'bullies' but not school shooters. Shocking, I know.
Because only a fucking troll or retard would sit there and tell me that "I realized poking a tiger would result in me being mauled, so I poked it until it ripped my guts out, because how dare it have the audacity to react to being antagonized".
If you're equating people with wild animals, then you could try to justify not 'judging' school shooters like the OP - but calling people wild animals is judgment in itself.
I can discuss one thing without discussing other things.
Yeah, I bet you don't want to discuss how you do judge 'bullies' but not school shooters. Curious, innit?
I can also understand why someone would do something, without condoning it.
And I can also understand why someone would do something, specifically bully you because you're an absolute whackjob and mental patient, without condoning it.
You disapprove of 'bullying' but approve of school shootings. That makes you not an 'easy target', but a nutcase. Apparently, your fellow students recognized that you are a basketcase.
Ah yes, the reasonable response in your scenario, is to attack a psychopath until they fucking kill you.
Goddamn dude, your takes are either brilliant or fucking retarded/attempts to just be a contrarian.
What is this, contrarianism, or are you really fucking dumb enough to trot out "you were bullied and treated like shit because people realized you would kill them for bullying you"?
Because only a fucking troll or retard would sit there and tell me that "I realized poking a tiger would result in me being mauled, so I poked it until it ripped my guts out, because how dare it have the audacity to react to being antagonized".
Imp posted this, so I honestly think that's probably the biggest motivator. Ant always seems to feel compelled to oppose everything and anyone imp supports, even on the rare occasions where imp isn't being hysterical.
Lots of bad blood at this point, everyone has their foibles I guess. 🤷♂️
Imp is just comic relief. But a moron who says he will judge bullies but not school shooters is malignant.
Who talked about reasonableness? If someone doesn't judge school shooters, there's clearly something wrong with him. If he then says that he was bullied, then maybe he wasn't as innocent as he's letting on.
Why not both? Yes, I hold the highly contrarian position that it's bad to judge 'bullies' but not school shooters. Shocking, I know.
If you're equating people with wild animals, then you could try to justify not 'judging' school shooters like the OP - but calling people wild animals is judgment in itself.
Yet you judge people for 'bullying' but not for school shootings. So "I technically don't approve" is a distinction without a difference.
Yeah, I bet you don't want to discuss how you do judge 'bullies' but not school shooters. Curious, innit?
And I can also understand why someone would do something, specifically bully you because you're an absolute whackjob and mental patient, without condoning it.
Hey, this is fun.