At least you admit I wouldn't say something that advocated violence.
We'd be no better than feminists if we started grave dancing on 14 year old girls. I truly believe our humanity in the face of their lack of it is what will give us a win. Not by appealing to their emotions that they likely don't have towards us, but by society seeing that they are the clear aggressors.
The only answer is violence. The further women react by oppressing men, the higher chance that in the long-term there will be a large enough reaction to finally put women back in their place. You don't beat women with weakness. You best them through force.
I'm sorry, I can't agree with this. I think that there are non-violent solutions.
I also think that justifying killing kids is not something I could ever be comfortable with. If you devalue the lives of children, how are you any better than our enemy?
I have absolutely zero doubt that girls were making this boy's life a living hell, but killing people isn't the answer, both morally and politically.
This is exactly what women have been wishing for, for years, because now they have an example to point to that isn't Elliot Rodger.
This will only embolden women to further attack our basic human rights under the veneer of "safety".
This kid did more to destroy the lives of boys like himself than any single woman ever could. He gave the fake narrative a real story.
People need to be asking themselves what men did to deserve it and if they're being honest, it's hard not to agree with feminists' actions.
I didn't agree with him, why are you attacking me with his words?
It sounded like something you'd say, if the context weren't shooting. But this guy is a case apart, and probably a glowie.
At least you admit I wouldn't say something that advocated violence.
We'd be no better than feminists if we started grave dancing on 14 year old girls. I truly believe our humanity in the face of their lack of it is what will give us a win. Not by appealing to their emotions that they likely don't have towards us, but by society seeing that they are the clear aggressors.
The only answer is violence. The further women react by oppressing men, the higher chance that in the long-term there will be a large enough reaction to finally put women back in their place. You don't beat women with weakness. You best them through force.
I'm sorry, I can't agree with this. I think that there are non-violent solutions.
I also think that justifying killing kids is not something I could ever be comfortable with. If you devalue the lives of children, how are you any better than our enemy?
Imp1 getting hacked by Feds so they can run controlled opposition on his account is a funny story arc.
Okay, don't fucking libel me, you cretin.
Libeling you is impossible.