Adorable, but that’s far from accurate, we both know biology isn’t your strong suit though.
Are you denying that being morbidly obese means that you need more muscle mass to carry around all that fat?
Taller people physically need a higher bone density to even walk. Again biology isn’t your strong suit…
So it's just tallness, not 'bone density' per se. Yet you claimed that BMI does not take that into account, when of course it does take tallness into account.
BTW, just looking around at what Americans call 'tall', it's pretty funny to hear one bragging about how tall they are. 6 foot and taller is the norm in northern Europe.
Are you denying that being morbidly obese means that you need more muscle mass to carry around all that fat?
Yes, this is assumptive that the person is active enough for muscle to grow. Fatty riding the rascal doesn’t have more muscle mass than someone 300 pounds lighter. Again biology is not your strong suit.
So it's just tallness, not 'bone density' per se. Yet you claimed that BMI does not take that into account, when of course it does take tallness into account.
Tallness was just an example, Americans in general have a higher bone density due to diet.
BTW, just looking around at what Americans call 'tall', it's pretty funny to hear one bragging about how tall they are. 6 foot and taller is the norm in northern Europe.
I live in a fairly Dutch area, women over 6 feet is normal here, but nice try with your assumptives again.
You don’t. This isn’t even anecdotal, just about every ethnicity grows taller and has more muscle mass in America versus a foreign country.
Taller, you said? So nothing about bone density?
Yes, if you're morbidly obese, you'll need slightly more muscle mass to keep up all that fat. That's not exactly something to brag about.
Adorable, but that’s far from accurate, we both know biology isn’t your strong suit though.
Taller people physically need a higher bone density to even walk. Again biology isn’t your strong suit…
Are you denying that being morbidly obese means that you need more muscle mass to carry around all that fat?
So it's just tallness, not 'bone density' per se. Yet you claimed that BMI does not take that into account, when of course it does take tallness into account.
BTW, just looking around at what Americans call 'tall', it's pretty funny to hear one bragging about how tall they are. 6 foot and taller is the norm in northern Europe.
Yes, this is assumptive that the person is active enough for muscle to grow. Fatty riding the rascal doesn’t have more muscle mass than someone 300 pounds lighter. Again biology is not your strong suit.
Tallness was just an example, Americans in general have a higher bone density due to diet.
I live in a fairly Dutch area, women over 6 feet is normal here, but nice try with your assumptives again.