I imagine its still done in the interest of "they are still kids, they can turn their life around" and to let them not have it hanging over them later. I don't agree with it, but the idea is consistent with a lot of other laws around minors.
But we also all know if he was a wrong think offender, they'd name him from every rooftop. So its all moot and fuck them.
Exactly, and you can even look at a lot of the "tried as adult" cases to find out they really only care about protecting minors when its narratively beneficial.
Well, most of the "they dindu nuffin, wuz goin' ta church" is bullshit, and they'll be career criminals/thugs until they get put in the ground the hard way
I imagine its still done in the interest of "they are still kids, they can turn their life around" and to let them not have it hanging over them later. I don't agree with it, but the idea is consistent with a lot of other laws around minors.
But we also all know if he was a wrong think offender, they'd name him from every rooftop. So its all moot and fuck them.
The entirety of mainstream media couldn’t wait to put Sandmann, a minor who wasn’t even accused of a crime, on their front pages.
And then a lefty judge dismissed a bunch of his slam dunk defamation lawsuits.
Exactly, and you can even look at a lot of the "tried as adult" cases to find out they really only care about protecting minors when its narratively beneficial.
Well, most of the "they dindu nuffin, wuz goin' ta church" is bullshit, and they'll be career criminals/thugs until they get put in the ground the hard way