Wait, so the reason you claimed DeSantis was "bribed and blackmailed by women" now doesn't benefit women at all? I can't wait how you try to weasel yourself out of this one.
After all, men are slowly becoming a greater share of alimony recipients, meaning that the prime beneficiaries of the current law aren't women, but rather slackers of both genders.
It's clear they are planning for the future. If they are pushing everyone else out of work and discriminating to hold that advantage, they're going to want things like alimony removed. DeSimptis is still backed by Chip Roy, so even disregarding that, he's a piece of shit.
I chose to disregard the obvious weaselly disclaimer.
Ah, the reason I was absolutely sure he was "bribed and blackmailed by feminists" I now admit is complete hokum, so I'll scream about something else instead.
Give me one reason to hate Chip Roy that doesn't put you on the same side as the Democrats - who you were sure were "stabbing the womens in the back" because they backed the female draft.
“Traditionalism” you mean like marriage? That was stamped out by force of law already, why not kill the only part women wanted to keep to benefit themselves?
No? Once again you are enabling women to get a guaranteed paycheck to “raise” her kids and whore around. There is no legitimate reason for alimony after no fault divorce was passed.
I never embraced [All Lives Matter], but I used to be ambivalent toward it until a black friend in college used a great metaphor to convince me that it's not a great phrase: it's like going to someone's funeral and saying, "why aren't we mourning all the other people who've ever died?"… link - archive.org - archive.today
��Hawley gambled he could rip open Pandora's box & vote to steal the election from Biden's 81 million voters to advance his 2024 hopes. When he told followers to "STAND UP," they listened and murdered a cop while storming the Capitol. He lost. Make him pay. https://t.co/vRriW6y5l4�link - archive.org - archive.today
��The Arbery case should be THE racial justice story of the moment. The McMichaels, one of whom called Ahmaud's corpse a f-ing n-word, were not arrested for 74 DAYS after the killing. It was an actual lynching that McMichael allies in law enforcement tried to let go unpunished. https://t.co/wfd4HpPvJ8�link - archive.org - archive.today
But you're blatantly lying (as usual).
Here's the part you left out:
The "First Wives Advocacy" group claims to represent the interest of "women, mothers, and children," but it's hard to imagine any proportion less feminist and less pro-family that telling women they must depend on the husbands they abandon and both women and men that they may have to pay an abuser or adulteress for the rest of their lives if they commit to marriage. After all, men are slowly becoming a greater share of alimony recipients, meaning that the prime beneficiaries of the current law aren't women, but rather slackers of both genders.
You read this, and you decided to leave out the last part of the sentence to advance your agenda of lunacy.
Wait, so the reason you claimed DeSantis was "bribed and blackmailed by women" now doesn't benefit women at all? I can't wait how you try to weasel yourself out of this one.
You must have missed that part of the sentence.
It's clear they are planning for the future. If they are pushing everyone else out of work and discriminating to hold that advantage, they're going to want things like alimony removed. DeSimptis is still backed by Chip Roy, so even disregarding that, he's a piece of shit.
I chose to disregard the obvious weaselly disclaimer.
Ah, the reason I was absolutely sure he was "bribed and blackmailed by feminists" I now admit is complete hokum, so I'll scream about something else instead.
Give me one reason to hate Chip Roy that doesn't put you on the same side as the Democrats - who you were sure were "stabbing the womens in the back" because they backed the female draft.
Alimony should have never existed and still shouldn't.
It made sense when marriage required a legal reason for divorce. The continuing of it after no fault divorce was passed was a giant fuck you to men.
Division of assets should also not be a thing. You get what you put in, the end. No credit for intangibles.
Way to stamp out traditionalism by force of law.
“Traditionalism” you mean like marriage? That was stamped out by force of law already, why not kill the only part women wanted to keep to benefit themselves?
Only women who don't work and instead raise the kids should be granted alimony.
No? Once again you are enabling women to get a guaranteed paycheck to “raise” her kids and whore around. There is no legitimate reason for alimony after no fault divorce was passed.
Who talked about whoring around?
Without alimony, raising kids means that you're missing out on income and job skills.
Women are just the human embodiment of gaslighting.
Permanent alimony should be legal...until men start getting it, then it's bad.
I have no love for this BLM-supporting cunt Tiana Lowe:
But you're blatantly lying (as usual).
Here's the part you left out:
You read this, and you decided to leave out the last part of the sentence to advance your agenda of lunacy.