A curriculum usually comes from a textbook, so that's purely semantics.
How do you say such retarded things with a straight face. A curriculum is the entire comprehensive structure of a teaching unit. The textbook is a single part of any of that, and usually one of many. My sex ed curriculum back in the day had zero textbooks and was entirely printoffs.
And like I said above, I don't give two shits about the female half of this equation but "person who produces sperm" is outright directly sexualizing young boys, in a way none of them are for girls.
If you think teachers do anything more than churn out lessons based off textbooks, you're retarded. ChatGPT could do what they do. Maybe in the future it actually will and they'll all end up homeless. That's a fun thought.
Nobody's going to care about boys being sexualized. That's the shitty society we live in, where the right only cares if it affects women, the left only cares if it affects women and men are demonized, dehumanized and shut out of work by the very women they're being told they have to care about.
If you think teachers do anything more than churn out lessons based off textbooks, you're retarded
I do, because I actually went to school in the US and saw it happen many times. Including my own sex ed class. I feel like my actual experience trumps your wild hate.
Nobody's going to care about boys being sexualized.
I do, that's why I have an issue with it. Unlike you, who doesn't care about helping anyone if it means women might also benefit or be involved.
Come on, you've seen the sheer volume of absolute trash that goes into teaching now.
who doesn't care about helping anyone if it means women might also benefit or be involved.
Why on earth would you benefit your enemy? You should only help your own side, and anything you push for should harm them (financially, politically etc not physically) or at most have no effect. This shouldn't change until they are willing to support you, which they aren't. The only time women talk about the boys being castrated is to call them future rapists who did it to get into women's showers.
Didn't you see my post from yesterday? Women brainwashing kids by taking time out of classes to teach them to "respect women"? That's what you're enabling if you help women.
Come on, you've seen the sheer volume of absolute trash that goes into teaching now.
Irrelevant and a complete goal post move. Teaching curriculum has way more than just direct textbook transcribing, even if its still trash by a lazy or politically motivated idiot.
Why on earth would you benefit your enemy?
Because everything that could help men, will help women in some form. Even if they don't like it. I won't condemn men to suffering and misery just to make sure women also are.
And that's operating on your wild assumption that not wanting boys to be called "people who produce sperm" is part of whatever you consider the "war on women" in your head. Which I don't agree with.
How do you say such retarded things with a straight face. A curriculum is the entire comprehensive structure of a teaching unit. The textbook is a single part of any of that, and usually one of many. My sex ed curriculum back in the day had zero textbooks and was entirely printoffs.
And like I said above, I don't give two shits about the female half of this equation but "person who produces sperm" is outright directly sexualizing young boys, in a way none of them are for girls.
If you think teachers do anything more than churn out lessons based off textbooks, you're retarded. ChatGPT could do what they do. Maybe in the future it actually will and they'll all end up homeless. That's a fun thought.
Nobody's going to care about boys being sexualized. That's the shitty society we live in, where the right only cares if it affects women, the left only cares if it affects women and men are demonized, dehumanized and shut out of work by the very women they're being told they have to care about.
I do, because I actually went to school in the US and saw it happen many times. Including my own sex ed class. I feel like my actual experience trumps your wild hate.
I do, that's why I have an issue with it. Unlike you, who doesn't care about helping anyone if it means women might also benefit or be involved.
Come on, you've seen the sheer volume of absolute trash that goes into teaching now.
Why on earth would you benefit your enemy? You should only help your own side, and anything you push for should harm them (financially, politically etc not physically) or at most have no effect. This shouldn't change until they are willing to support you, which they aren't. The only time women talk about the boys being castrated is to call them future rapists who did it to get into women's showers.
Didn't you see my post from yesterday? Women brainwashing kids by taking time out of classes to teach them to "respect women"? That's what you're enabling if you help women.
Irrelevant and a complete goal post move. Teaching curriculum has way more than just direct textbook transcribing, even if its still trash by a lazy or politically motivated idiot.
Because everything that could help men, will help women in some form. Even if they don't like it. I won't condemn men to suffering and misery just to make sure women also are.
And that's operating on your wild assumption that not wanting boys to be called "people who produce sperm" is part of whatever you consider the "war on women" in your head. Which I don't agree with.