Pretty sure a sample size nearing 100 should return at least ONE data point that reveals the vaxx causes problems.
Then you must be pretty sure the rate of serious side effects people are claiming is 1 in 100 or greater. A vaccine with 1 in 100 side effects would be absolute dogshit.
Normal vaccines are in the area of 1 in more than a million. This vaccine seems to have around 1 in 10,000 of serious side effects so you'd have less than 1% chance of personally knowing somebody.
Even 1 in 10,000 is really bad and especially so with the mRNA because it can everywhere and reprogram any cell type, and what you get from that is a wide range of damage and severity. So for every one person with obvious problems there's many more with not quite enough damage to seek treatment, file a report, or even connect it back to the vaccine.
Then you must be pretty sure the rate of serious side effects people are claiming is 1 in 100 or greater. A vaccine with 1 in 100 side effects would be absolute dogshit.
Normal vaccines are in the area of 1 in more than a million. This vaccine seems to have around 1 in 10,000 of serious side effects so you'd have less than 1% chance of personally knowing somebody.
Even 1 in 10,000 is really bad and especially so with the mRNA because it can everywhere and reprogram any cell type, and what you get from that is a wide range of damage and severity. So for every one person with obvious problems there's many more with not quite enough damage to seek treatment, file a report, or even connect it back to the vaccine.