I never got the shot, but out of the dozens and dozens of people I know who got it (many getting the 3rd shot as well); not a one has had any problems. No side effects, heart attacks, etc.
Pretty sure a sample size nearing 100 should return at least ONE data point that reveals the vaxx causes problems.
I think the vaxx was a big money making scam, but at this point holding on to the "it's a clot shot"/"it's a depopulation shot" idea is simply deluded.
Yeah this graph makes things look bad but there could be plenty of reasons for this sort of anomaly. At this point I am more skeptical of those trusting numbers games instead of their own experiences.
Pretty sure a sample size nearing 100 should return at least ONE data point that reveals the vaxx causes problems.
Then you must be pretty sure the rate of serious side effects people are claiming is 1 in 100 or greater. A vaccine with 1 in 100 side effects would be absolute dogshit.
Normal vaccines are in the area of 1 in more than a million. This vaccine seems to have around 1 in 10,000 of serious side effects so you'd have less than 1% chance of personally knowing somebody.
Even 1 in 10,000 is really bad and especially so with the mRNA because it can everywhere and reprogram any cell type, and what you get from that is a wide range of damage and severity. So for every one person with obvious problems there's many more with not quite enough damage to seek treatment, file a report, or even connect it back to the vaccine.
I never got the shot, but out of the dozens and dozens of people I know who got it (many getting the 3rd shot as well); not a one has had any problems. No side effects, heart attacks, etc.
Pretty sure a sample size nearing 100 should return at least ONE data point that reveals the vaxx causes problems.
I think the vaxx was a big money making scam, but at this point holding on to the "it's a clot shot"/"it's a depopulation shot" idea is simply deluded.
Yeah this graph makes things look bad but there could be plenty of reasons for this sort of anomaly. At this point I am more skeptical of those trusting numbers games instead of their own experiences.
Other vaccines were withdrawn when 1 in a thousand people were injured.
This vaxx is up to 1 in 30.
And the original disease had only a 1 in 20 million fatality rate for young people without comorbidities.
The difference? pharma $$$
Then you must be pretty sure the rate of serious side effects people are claiming is 1 in 100 or greater. A vaccine with 1 in 100 side effects would be absolute dogshit.
Normal vaccines are in the area of 1 in more than a million. This vaccine seems to have around 1 in 10,000 of serious side effects so you'd have less than 1% chance of personally knowing somebody.
Even 1 in 10,000 is really bad and especially so with the mRNA because it can everywhere and reprogram any cell type, and what you get from that is a wide range of damage and severity. So for every one person with obvious problems there's many more with not quite enough damage to seek treatment, file a report, or even connect it back to the vaccine.