What's the functional difference between it rising if you have a daughter and not rising if you don't, and lowering it when you have a son? It's purely semantics.
Having a son makes it go to 3 and having a daughter makes it go to 7. Both do the same thing, gives the leftist side a +2 advantage, it’s just the actual number that causes the +2 is different.
Not everyone is artificially elevated to an equal extent. Latinos get advantaged less than blacks but probably a good deal more than women.
Is that true though? I'm sure you've seen me post ESG criteria from various companies that openly pushes hiring less men.
Women are likely the most artificially elevated group because most banks' ESG components are run by them.
I remember your laughable claim that having a son would result in a lower ESG score, as if that is part of the calculation.
Non sequitur.
What's the functional difference between it rising if you have a daughter and not rising if you don't, and lowering it when you have a son? It's purely semantics.
How so?
Weird downvote.
Let’s say for example a neutral is a 5.
Having a son makes it go to 3 and having a daughter makes it go to 7. Both do the same thing, gives the leftist side a +2 advantage, it’s just the actual number that causes the +2 is different.