I'd be surprised if you even genuinely oppose supporting Ukraine. In the past, you were supporting neocon bullshit about "Islamofascism" which has been used to justify Middle Eastern imperialism.
Jihadism is Islamo-Leftism is Islamo-Fascism. That's why Syd wrote "Social Justice in Islam" as a founding document for the ideology. The Left even mimics his argument against "Baby It's Cold Outside" to this very day. (Granted his argument was to kill literally every single westerner alive, and there's is to cry sexism, but that's because he's a true zealot inspired by Mohammed's violence).
As for Ukraine, I've said before that the people of Ukraine have a right to defend themselves against a foreign incursion (which is at least what Russia did to Kiev). As for the Donbass region, they too, have a right to peaceably exit a government that has been at war with them. I support people defending themselves from foreigners trying to start a war. And right now, the Empire of Columbia (DC) is seeking everything in it's power to start a full scale war with Russia, possibly expanding into a nuclear exchange, all to line the pockets of very specific people within the White House, State Department, and Intelligence agencies; even at the cost of engaging in an act of war against Germany, depleting our military stockpiles, intentionally creating a vulnerability to allow China to invade Taiwan, and degrading our diplomatic and political influence in the world.
Also, we are actively supporting a Ukranian Nazi movement that I expect will probably become the legitimate government of Ukraine within two decades, and it's the US's fault. ... And actually, yeah, a bit of Israel's fault to for actually funding Nazis... what the fuck is wrong with you?
So yeah, I want the war to end because it benefits literally no one but evil people at this point, and is a massive strategic harm to the US in... every conceivable way. Prolonging the war by having SpecOps forces launch terrorist attacks in Moscow is not acceptable. Worse, I get the feeling that the purpose of those attacks is to generate reprisal attacks in the US to foment political solidarity and a nuclear exchange. I'm starting to get concerned that someone in the Biden regime is aiming for an Operation Northwoods scenario in 2024 because they are fucking insane and desperate.
So yeah, stop the fucking war. No one who is a good person benefits.
Before the war, the press was shitting bricks about "Nazis" there. They only STFU after the war.
Not true. They weren't shitting bricks because they were still being supported by NATO even then. It was just the wet farts of progressives who hadn't adopted full jingoism yet. They were nervous, they they got paid to start screaming "Slava Ukraini"
which the GAE considers its second biggest geopolitical rival behind China
I consider the whole focus on Russia to be a defense of the Security State's piggy bank for embezzlement, and a grudge the Fabians hold against Putin betraying them. After that, it's a clever psyop by China to basically kill ourselves.
The GAE will tolerate Nazi beliefs among cannon fodder in its periphery, not at home in the core. Of course, you are going to deliberately mislead people about the war being about allying with Nazi ideology.
They absolute would be okay with them being cannon fodder, but they aren't. They are effective troops that are gaining support and legitimacy. That being said, National Socialism has never been an inherent enemy to Fabian Socialism that dominates in the West. Same way National Socialism and Stalinism didn't have to be total ideological allies (and which was why Stalin believed Hitler). Fabians in the west sought to use Mussolini's Fascist Italy as a counter, not to National Socialism, but to Hitler specifically.
Our own Fabianism has quite nicely morphed into something approaching State Syndicalism, and the deification of the state under Covid was pretty clear. We have begun approaching Fascism, because Fascism is the inevitable practical endpoint of the application of Socialist doctrine.
As such Fabianism has never had any real ideological arguments against either Fascism or National Socialism. They are compatible in all but speed. Everything beyond that is conflict over general global strategic interests. Nothing more. Our state is slowly morphing into a Fascist one out of inevitability of Fabianism, and it is fully prepared to support National Socialism and Fascism abroad, not because of ideological similarity (though it helps), but because of strategic objectives.
Here, in the core, National Socialism is absolutely tolerated, specifically Black National Socialism; which has been praised, uplifted, incentivized, protected, and the revolutionary violence on the street is everywhere. BLM's swastika's are draped over our fucking embassies in foreign countries, and across our stadiums and streets. Their White Blackshirts kill people and their Brown(skin)shirts are currently "Me ne frego"-ing across LA and Chicago. Their Summer of Broken Glass in 2020 will be repeated again in 2024. Fascism and National Socialism were always Progressive.
White American racialism is the biggest threat to both of those.
No, it isn't, and it never was. It is a Leftist rebuke of Liberalism that took place in the pre-WW1 era, and was a major force for anti-Reactionary actions against the European empires of the time. White American Racialism was the core tenet of Woodrow Wilson's domestic and foreign policy, as a champion of most of the systems we have today.
In the modern sense there is no difference at all between the EU Europhiles and the Pan-Europa racialists. They are espousing the same shit: globalism off the argument of race. There is no difference between "workers of the world unite" and "whites of the world unite" it is merely another direction of the same thing. In fact, Pan-Africanism and Pan-Arabism are both progressive offshoots of this argument that was expanded by the Fabian Socialist order and led to massive and continual war in both the middle-east and Africa.
Let's just assume the ultimate super duper scary bogeymen of death were totes real and all. That still doesn't mean engaging in the wars there was a smart move. Your fear mongering about le bad men over there only served to justify the bullshit wars. Notice that we're having fewer Islamic terrorist problems now that we stopped fucking around as much over in the ME. It's almost as if the GAE's bullshit wars fueled radicalization of Muslims and therefore endangered us more than they helped anything. Let me guess, you're going to light-switch brain this into me being a Muzzie-lover.
intentionally creating a vulnerability to allow China to invade Taiwan, and degrading our diplomatic and political influence in the world.
If the GAE is goading China into invading Taiwan it's only so it can paint itself as liberators, which you will gleefully aid and abet if that happens. This idea that there is some force subverting America as a geopolitical power is complete bullshit. It's the subversion and destruction of white American people that is taking place. America's leadership is fully on board with that and fully on board with strengthening, not weakening the American empire. This empire simply does not care about its citizens. It cares about its core mega corporations, especially finance capital and the mic.
Also, we are actively supporting a Ukranian Nazi movement that I expect will probably become the legitimate government of Ukraine within two decades, and it's the US's fault
That's a risk the GAE was willing to take to crybully Russia into this war. Again, this doesn't mean the GAE is pro-Nazi, no more than supporting the Mujaheedeen (sp) against Russians made the US pro-Islamist. And yes, it did occur to me that even if Ukraine wins, the support for Nazis could blow up in the GAE's face. IIRC, I talked about that with SupremeReader before. Of course, the GAE is not stupid and fully intends to betray its Azov allies as soon as it thinks the time is right.
We have begun approaching Fascism, because Fascism is the inevitable practical endpoint of the application of Socialist doctrine
The US is a neoliberal hellscape. As usual, you deliberately confuse corporations weaponize the government with government hyper agency.
Here, in the core, National Socialism is absolutely tolerated, specifically Black National Socialism
No, it's not. Black idpol is tolerated, not black NS, and it's tolerated as a weapon against whites. It gets slapped down for turning against Jews. See West, Kanye or the NOI. Now I'm wondering if you consider MLK a NS since you so thoroughly embrace his mythology.
White American Racialism was the core tenet of Woodrow Wilson's domestic and foreign policy, as a champion of most of the systems we have today.
Ah, Woodrow Wilson, the crown jewel of liberals fallaciously linking white identity to progressivism. Yes, Wilson was a big gooberment progressive and an avowed racist. The whole country was racist back then though. You hacks always leave that out. Calvin Coolidge, a pretty popular guy among lolberts, by comparison, signed the 1924 immigration law and also said, "The Nordics propagate themselves successfully. With other races, the outcome shows deterioration on both sides. Quality of mind and body suggests that observance of ethnic law is as great a necessity to a nation as immigration law."
They are espousing the same shit: globalism off the argument of race.
No, they aren't, outside of Dicky Spencer who pisses everyone off and burns every bridge. White nationalism is almost entirely an American thing, and it is so because white Americans are of mixed European heritage and are far removed from our various ancestral homelands. None of us are globalists. You are doing the typical Jordan Peterson bullshit of trying to characterize white people's defense of our economic prosperity and dwindling political power as some sort of globohomo project. It's tiresome bullshit conjured up by an employee of a Jewish supremacist.
Us: "We want to end the mass, replacement immigration into our countries, stop them from being financially looted by usury schemes, and to actually prosecute criminals."
You: "This is globalism!"
There is no difference between "workers of the world unite" and "whites of the world unite"
Considering European nationalists of various sorts to be our allies or fellow travelers doesn't mean we wish to integrate all of Europe or its colonial off shoots.
What about "Jews of the world unite" ? You clowns always mysteriously miss that one in your shitty analogies.
Another irony is that "workers of the world unite" hinges on there being no meaningful difference between various peoples of the world, an idea that you, not I, believe in, civic nationalist.
You're being dishonest again by making up arguments that I'm not making. Also, I'm not going to quote-mine you because that's really annoying.
The Empire's wars didn't do much more than give an opportunity for the Saudis and Iranians to expand their proxy war, while also giving an outlet for the kind of Islamic Reactionary movements to Pan-Arabism that were inevitable. But the Jihadis were already long since dedicated to the extermination of the west before the Iraq War. The Jihadis were always going to come to the west and slaughter people regardless of opposition to the Iraq War: Germany, Sweden, and France prove that.
The Empire is not goading China into invading to paint themselves as Liberators. They are letting Taiwan fall because the Chinese are seizing an opportunity they built into the Empire's own system of corruption. As soon as we surrendered Afghanistan, I knew that Taiwan was in grave danger, and everything is signaling that Taiwan may not be able to be saved, and will likely be abandoned as well while the US and NATO empties all of it's available military surplus to Ukraine. The American Empire is no longer even run by Imperialists. It is run by beuracrats with personal and factional agendas that can be manipulated by other paymasters. No one is flying the plane.
I won't disagree that the Empire will betray their allies, ask Germany. What I'm saying is that the Empire has no objection to National Socialism.
Neo-Liberalism is simply Fabian Socialism. The slow and methodical movement of society to a Socialist state requires practicality and maintenance. Practically applied Socialism is inevitably Fascist by it's nature.
I'm not talking about Calvin Coolidge. And Woodrow Wilson is racist in what way? He was the leading advocate of White Supremacism as a Progressive ideology. All the shit about Red-Lining that the Left complains about... he invented it. He created the FHA with the explicit purpose of using federal funds and regulations to create segregation where there was none. He mandated racial discrimination in all aspects of the federal government. His aristocratic upbringing was the result of the Democrats literal terror campaign against Fusionism, Republicanism, and Integrationism. You say "everyone was racist", but your just repeating Leftist ahisotry: there were plenty of people who could be considered ethno-centric, and a few even bigoted, but most people had no interest in legally institutionalizing racial hierarchies and orderings prior to Wilson. Not to mention that white racialism flew in the face of ethnic tensions that had already long existed between european ethnic groups. The ideology, like the Volkish Equality movement, sought to smooth some ethnic tensions over while exacerbating them elsewhere for political balkanization.
And yeah, it is a globohomo project, just as I said it was. You will do the exact same shit that Shin Fein and the SNP is doing in Ireland right now: stop certain migration while ignoring others. "Keep hating on the English while we invite in more Pakistani Muslims." Fundamentally, your purpose will be the same as the NeoLibs: immigration creates demographic blocs within cities that can be controlled by a party boss system that guarantees your rule. You want white people to hate blacks, but you'll let in Albanians so long as it also happens to demographically displace any group of people that politically oppose your party boss system. That's how the authoritarianism works. You say you don't, but it's the same trick every time.
And I've told you I'm explicitly anti-Zionist. Zionism is "jews of the world unite!". Zionism is Leftist. Jews are not a race, they are a religion. A secular, "ethnically jewish", "liberal" state is Progressive Nationalism. A Zionist state is a progressive race state in the style that Wilson would have wanted. Many American jews are exactly that: Communists that are both pretending to be jews and pretending to not be white. You can tell from the way they tell the Orthodox jews of New York to shut up and die for the sake of Black National Socialism.
Imagine wanting to stay in Afghanistan after 20 years and calling yourself a libertarian who opposes big government. 🤡Thanks for confirming my suspicions about your fear mongering about "Islamafascism."
The invasion of Europe happened in part because of NATO sodomizing Gaddafi. Chaos in the Muslim world, thanks in large to these wars you love so much, served as the political justification for it. If the GAE's wars in the Muslim world were about defending the West from Muslims, why did the same assholes who wanted the wars also let the Muslims in? This may be the smelliest turd you've ever tried to float under my nose. It makes no fucking sense at all.
Taiwan is in as much danger from the US as it is from China. The GAE would reduce the place to rubble or goad China into doing it if it thought it were beneficial, just as it does to Ukraine. You seem to unironically believe the US is the world's cop and bases its foreign policy on what's morally good (as long as Republicans are in charge). I bet you would love it if GW Bush could have a third term, libertarian.
Neoliberalism is closer to libertarianism than it is to any socialism. Will you ever stop beating ideological labels into a pasty, indiscernible sludge?
I'm talking about Calvin Coolidge and the fact that even small government Republicans were racist because everyone was fucking racist. As I've already told you, ~95% of Americans opposed interracial marriage into the 1950s. America was never "colorblind." That's revisionist's history on your part. I demonstrated this months ago.
Stop certain immigration but allowing others is what you would do as well, dipshit civnat.
I want white people to confront the fact that blacks commit over 470K crimes against per year and do something about it.
"muh hatred" - Are you a member of Hope not Hate, faggot?
You are not anti-Zionist. You just play shell games with the definition of Zionism so badly that you hamstered your way into claiming Trump isn't Zionist. 🤡 Stop pretending our previous arguments never happened just because you got trounced.
Ortho Jews love the Zionist state of Israel, and their religion that you think is so wonderful is based on a collectivist identity that you would loathe if gentiles did it. I don't know why you thought mentioning Orthos would result anything other than you looking like an even bigger fraud.
Jihadism is Islamo-Leftism is Islamo-Fascism. That's why Syd wrote "Social Justice in Islam" as a founding document for the ideology. The Left even mimics his argument against "Baby It's Cold Outside" to this very day. (Granted his argument was to kill literally every single westerner alive, and there's is to cry sexism, but that's because he's a true zealot inspired by Mohammed's violence).
As for Ukraine, I've said before that the people of Ukraine have a right to defend themselves against a foreign incursion (which is at least what Russia did to Kiev). As for the Donbass region, they too, have a right to peaceably exit a government that has been at war with them. I support people defending themselves from foreigners trying to start a war. And right now, the Empire of Columbia (DC) is seeking everything in it's power to start a full scale war with Russia, possibly expanding into a nuclear exchange, all to line the pockets of very specific people within the White House, State Department, and Intelligence agencies; even at the cost of engaging in an act of war against Germany, depleting our military stockpiles, intentionally creating a vulnerability to allow China to invade Taiwan, and degrading our diplomatic and political influence in the world.
Also, we are actively supporting a Ukranian Nazi movement that I expect will probably become the legitimate government of Ukraine within two decades, and it's the US's fault. ... And actually, yeah, a bit of Israel's fault to for actually funding Nazis... what the fuck is wrong with you?
So yeah, I want the war to end because it benefits literally no one but evil people at this point, and is a massive strategic harm to the US in... every conceivable way. Prolonging the war by having SpecOps forces launch terrorist attacks in Moscow is not acceptable. Worse, I get the feeling that the purpose of those attacks is to generate reprisal attacks in the US to foment political solidarity and a nuclear exchange. I'm starting to get concerned that someone in the Biden regime is aiming for an Operation Northwoods scenario in 2024 because they are fucking insane and desperate.
So yeah, stop the fucking war. No one who is a good person benefits.
Not true. They weren't shitting bricks because they were still being supported by NATO even then. It was just the wet farts of progressives who hadn't adopted full jingoism yet. They were nervous, they they got paid to start screaming "Slava Ukraini"
I consider the whole focus on Russia to be a defense of the Security State's piggy bank for embezzlement, and a grudge the Fabians hold against Putin betraying them. After that, it's a clever psyop by China to basically kill ourselves.
They absolute would be okay with them being cannon fodder, but they aren't. They are effective troops that are gaining support and legitimacy. That being said, National Socialism has never been an inherent enemy to Fabian Socialism that dominates in the West. Same way National Socialism and Stalinism didn't have to be total ideological allies (and which was why Stalin believed Hitler). Fabians in the west sought to use Mussolini's Fascist Italy as a counter, not to National Socialism, but to Hitler specifically.
Our own Fabianism has quite nicely morphed into something approaching State Syndicalism, and the deification of the state under Covid was pretty clear. We have begun approaching Fascism, because Fascism is the inevitable practical endpoint of the application of Socialist doctrine.
As such Fabianism has never had any real ideological arguments against either Fascism or National Socialism. They are compatible in all but speed. Everything beyond that is conflict over general global strategic interests. Nothing more. Our state is slowly morphing into a Fascist one out of inevitability of Fabianism, and it is fully prepared to support National Socialism and Fascism abroad, not because of ideological similarity (though it helps), but because of strategic objectives.
Here, in the core, National Socialism is absolutely tolerated, specifically Black National Socialism; which has been praised, uplifted, incentivized, protected, and the revolutionary violence on the street is everywhere. BLM's swastika's are draped over our fucking embassies in foreign countries, and across our stadiums and streets. Their White Blackshirts kill people and their Brown(skin)shirts are currently "Me ne frego"-ing across LA and Chicago. Their Summer of Broken Glass in 2020 will be repeated again in 2024. Fascism and National Socialism were always Progressive.
No, it isn't, and it never was. It is a Leftist rebuke of Liberalism that took place in the pre-WW1 era, and was a major force for anti-Reactionary actions against the European empires of the time. White American Racialism was the core tenet of Woodrow Wilson's domestic and foreign policy, as a champion of most of the systems we have today.
In the modern sense there is no difference at all between the EU Europhiles and the Pan-Europa racialists. They are espousing the same shit: globalism off the argument of race. There is no difference between "workers of the world unite" and "whites of the world unite" it is merely another direction of the same thing. In fact, Pan-Africanism and Pan-Arabism are both progressive offshoots of this argument that was expanded by the Fabian Socialist order and led to massive and continual war in both the middle-east and Africa.
Let's just assume the ultimate super duper scary bogeymen of death were totes real and all. That still doesn't mean engaging in the wars there was a smart move. Your fear mongering about le bad men over there only served to justify the bullshit wars. Notice that we're having fewer Islamic terrorist problems now that we stopped fucking around as much over in the ME. It's almost as if the GAE's bullshit wars fueled radicalization of Muslims and therefore endangered us more than they helped anything. Let me guess, you're going to light-switch brain this into me being a Muzzie-lover.
If the GAE is goading China into invading Taiwan it's only so it can paint itself as liberators, which you will gleefully aid and abet if that happens. This idea that there is some force subverting America as a geopolitical power is complete bullshit. It's the subversion and destruction of white American people that is taking place. America's leadership is fully on board with that and fully on board with strengthening, not weakening the American empire. This empire simply does not care about its citizens. It cares about its core mega corporations, especially finance capital and the mic.
That's a risk the GAE was willing to take to crybully Russia into this war. Again, this doesn't mean the GAE is pro-Nazi, no more than supporting the Mujaheedeen (sp) against Russians made the US pro-Islamist. And yes, it did occur to me that even if Ukraine wins, the support for Nazis could blow up in the GAE's face. IIRC, I talked about that with SupremeReader before. Of course, the GAE is not stupid and fully intends to betray its Azov allies as soon as it thinks the time is right.
The US is a neoliberal hellscape. As usual, you deliberately confuse corporations weaponize the government with government hyper agency.
No, it's not. Black idpol is tolerated, not black NS, and it's tolerated as a weapon against whites. It gets slapped down for turning against Jews. See West, Kanye or the NOI. Now I'm wondering if you consider MLK a NS since you so thoroughly embrace his mythology.
Ah, Woodrow Wilson, the crown jewel of liberals fallaciously linking white identity to progressivism. Yes, Wilson was a big gooberment progressive and an avowed racist. The whole country was racist back then though. You hacks always leave that out. Calvin Coolidge, a pretty popular guy among lolberts, by comparison, signed the 1924 immigration law and also said, "The Nordics propagate themselves successfully. With other races, the outcome shows deterioration on both sides. Quality of mind and body suggests that observance of ethnic law is as great a necessity to a nation as immigration law."
No, they aren't, outside of Dicky Spencer who pisses everyone off and burns every bridge. White nationalism is almost entirely an American thing, and it is so because white Americans are of mixed European heritage and are far removed from our various ancestral homelands. None of us are globalists. You are doing the typical Jordan Peterson bullshit of trying to characterize white people's defense of our economic prosperity and dwindling political power as some sort of globohomo project. It's tiresome bullshit conjured up by an employee of a Jewish supremacist.
Us: "We want to end the mass, replacement immigration into our countries, stop them from being financially looted by usury schemes, and to actually prosecute criminals."
You: "This is globalism!"
Considering European nationalists of various sorts to be our allies or fellow travelers doesn't mean we wish to integrate all of Europe or its colonial off shoots.
What about "Jews of the world unite" ? You clowns always mysteriously miss that one in your shitty analogies.
Another irony is that "workers of the world unite" hinges on there being no meaningful difference between various peoples of the world, an idea that you, not I, believe in, civic nationalist.
You're being dishonest again by making up arguments that I'm not making. Also, I'm not going to quote-mine you because that's really annoying.
The Empire's wars didn't do much more than give an opportunity for the Saudis and Iranians to expand their proxy war, while also giving an outlet for the kind of Islamic Reactionary movements to Pan-Arabism that were inevitable. But the Jihadis were already long since dedicated to the extermination of the west before the Iraq War. The Jihadis were always going to come to the west and slaughter people regardless of opposition to the Iraq War: Germany, Sweden, and France prove that.
The Empire is not goading China into invading to paint themselves as Liberators. They are letting Taiwan fall because the Chinese are seizing an opportunity they built into the Empire's own system of corruption. As soon as we surrendered Afghanistan, I knew that Taiwan was in grave danger, and everything is signaling that Taiwan may not be able to be saved, and will likely be abandoned as well while the US and NATO empties all of it's available military surplus to Ukraine. The American Empire is no longer even run by Imperialists. It is run by beuracrats with personal and factional agendas that can be manipulated by other paymasters. No one is flying the plane.
I won't disagree that the Empire will betray their allies, ask Germany. What I'm saying is that the Empire has no objection to National Socialism.
Neo-Liberalism is simply Fabian Socialism. The slow and methodical movement of society to a Socialist state requires practicality and maintenance. Practically applied Socialism is inevitably Fascist by it's nature.
I'm not talking about Calvin Coolidge. And Woodrow Wilson is racist in what way? He was the leading advocate of White Supremacism as a Progressive ideology. All the shit about Red-Lining that the Left complains about... he invented it. He created the FHA with the explicit purpose of using federal funds and regulations to create segregation where there was none. He mandated racial discrimination in all aspects of the federal government. His aristocratic upbringing was the result of the Democrats literal terror campaign against Fusionism, Republicanism, and Integrationism. You say "everyone was racist", but your just repeating Leftist ahisotry: there were plenty of people who could be considered ethno-centric, and a few even bigoted, but most people had no interest in legally institutionalizing racial hierarchies and orderings prior to Wilson. Not to mention that white racialism flew in the face of ethnic tensions that had already long existed between european ethnic groups. The ideology, like the Volkish Equality movement, sought to smooth some ethnic tensions over while exacerbating them elsewhere for political balkanization.
And yeah, it is a globohomo project, just as I said it was. You will do the exact same shit that Shin Fein and the SNP is doing in Ireland right now: stop certain migration while ignoring others. "Keep hating on the English while we invite in more Pakistani Muslims." Fundamentally, your purpose will be the same as the NeoLibs: immigration creates demographic blocs within cities that can be controlled by a party boss system that guarantees your rule. You want white people to hate blacks, but you'll let in Albanians so long as it also happens to demographically displace any group of people that politically oppose your party boss system. That's how the authoritarianism works. You say you don't, but it's the same trick every time.
And I've told you I'm explicitly anti-Zionist. Zionism is "jews of the world unite!". Zionism is Leftist. Jews are not a race, they are a religion. A secular, "ethnically jewish", "liberal" state is Progressive Nationalism. A Zionist state is a progressive race state in the style that Wilson would have wanted. Many American jews are exactly that: Communists that are both pretending to be jews and pretending to not be white. You can tell from the way they tell the Orthodox jews of New York to shut up and die for the sake of Black National Socialism.
Imagine wanting to stay in Afghanistan after 20 years and calling yourself a libertarian who opposes big government. 🤡Thanks for confirming my suspicions about your fear mongering about "Islamafascism."
The invasion of Europe happened in part because of NATO sodomizing Gaddafi. Chaos in the Muslim world, thanks in large to these wars you love so much, served as the political justification for it. If the GAE's wars in the Muslim world were about defending the West from Muslims, why did the same assholes who wanted the wars also let the Muslims in? This may be the smelliest turd you've ever tried to float under my nose. It makes no fucking sense at all.
Taiwan is in as much danger from the US as it is from China. The GAE would reduce the place to rubble or goad China into doing it if it thought it were beneficial, just as it does to Ukraine. You seem to unironically believe the US is the world's cop and bases its foreign policy on what's morally good (as long as Republicans are in charge). I bet you would love it if GW Bush could have a third term, libertarian.
Neoliberalism is closer to libertarianism than it is to any socialism. Will you ever stop beating ideological labels into a pasty, indiscernible sludge?
I'm talking about Calvin Coolidge and the fact that even small government Republicans were racist because everyone was fucking racist. As I've already told you, ~95% of Americans opposed interracial marriage into the 1950s. America was never "colorblind." That's revisionist's history on your part. I demonstrated this months ago.
Stop certain immigration but allowing others is what you would do as well, dipshit civnat.
I want white people to confront the fact that blacks commit over 470K crimes against per year and do something about it.
"muh hatred" - Are you a member of Hope not Hate, faggot?
You are not anti-Zionist. You just play shell games with the definition of Zionism so badly that you hamstered your way into claiming Trump isn't Zionist. 🤡 Stop pretending our previous arguments never happened just because you got trounced.
Ortho Jews love the Zionist state of Israel, and their religion that you think is so wonderful is based on a collectivist identity that you would loathe if gentiles did it. I don't know why you thought mentioning Orthos would result anything other than you looking like an even bigger fraud.
You're being utterly dishonest again. At no point did I ever say we should stay in Afghanistan for 20 years, and at no point did I insinuate such.
We can't talk if you won't act honestly.