The lolicon issue that a lot of conservatives are trying to start by linking it to trans is a non-starter and to their detriment. Plus it alienates those who hold conservative opinions but like anime.
Lolicon works off a separation of reality and fiction. You can do WHATEVER you want to a drawing, it's a drawing it has no agency but ask the majority of lolicons if they think kids should be sexually active and they'll beat the shit out of you...if they can some really need to exercise more.
Trans LIVES in fiction, thinking that gender can be changed like clothes and that sex is an entitlement to all INCLUDING children with how much they try to include kids in their activities.
Trying to conflate lolicon and trans is like conflating Jews and Muslims. You are taking two groups that hate each other to be both pissed at you and see you as the enemy.
The lolicon issue that a lot of conservatives are trying to start by linking it to trans is a non-starter and to their detriment. Plus it alienates those who hold conservative opinions but like anime.
A lot of fucking weirdos are into lolis. It's pedo shit if you jack off to lolis. It just is. Lolis are explicitly designed to appeal to pedos.
I watch anime a lot. My GF is Japanese. It's very transparent that there are a significant number of characters inserted into some shows purely to appeal to fetishes so that the show will sell more to those fetishists. Lolis are designed to appeal to pedos. The more recent "imoto" fetish is a combination of pedophilia & incest. Even Black Clover - a mainstream big title - has a protagonist character who is openly sexually into his little sister.
ask the majority of lolicons if they think kids should be sexually active and they'll beat the shit out of you...
X: doubt. Not if they're being honest.
This particular tranny is also into lolis. Sexually. Not because he thinks they're cute, but because he likes to masturbate to them. And he does it enough to proudly say it in public. That doesn't mean ALL trannies are like that, but the simple fact is that mentally ill people have comorbidities, so a tranny is much more likely to be into lolis or other forms of sexual deviancy when compared to just a normal sane person.
It just is. Lolis are explicitly designed to appeal to pedos.
No and no.
Lolis do not even resemble human beings, let alone human children. Japanese and Japanese-styled art DOMINATES the erotic space while the realism of western art has been utterly sidelined. We haven't seen a millennial Boris Vallejo or Frank Frazetta because eroticism in that style just doesn't sell any more. The Japs blew it the fuck away and relegated it to western women's romance novel book covers.
The overwhelming majority of people jacking off to drawings aren't looking for realism. That's WHY they're jacking off to drawings.
Lolis do not even resemble human beings, let alone human children.
Lolis are 100% intended to resemble human children, just like adult anime women with big tits are intended to resemble human adult women. It doesn't matter that they are not photo-realistic. There is a reason that human males get hard dicks for big anime titties but not for the cast of the Pixar movies Cars or Finding Nemo.
Lolis are carefully crafted to have traits that pedophiles will get triggered by & sexually aroused by. That's why they exist. Same with many other fetish bait tropes like Moe, Tsunderes, Yanderes, and all the others. This is especially true in harem anime but it leaks into mainstream titles as well since the Japanese are taught that putting this shit in their anime = more sales.
The overwhelming majority of people jacking off to drawings aren't looking for realism. That's WHY they're jacking off to drawings.
A pedo who masturbates to "unrealistic" lolis is still a pedo. I really don't care if you want to argue "b-b-but he's an ethical pedo because he doesn't go after real cp!" I DON'T CARE. HE IS STILL A PEDO. which is all I said to begin with.
It doesn't matter that they are not photo-realistic
They are not just 'not photorealistic', they do not even have human proportions. You're screaming 'pedophile!' at people jacking off to something that looks NOTHING like a human child and has a facial structure literally closer to that of a kitten than a human being.
Your opinions on this are transparently those of an artistic illiterate who has never drawn anything in his life and has zero understanding of or care for how character design/proportion plays with people's brains to create pleasing illusions of things that are simply not there.
A pedo who masturbates to "unrealistic" lolis is still a pedo.
This statement is your entire position, sI'm going to succinctly break down how retarded this statement is by translating it into plain English:
'A person who masturbates to something that looks nothing like a human child is a person who is sexually attracted to human children'.
The lolicon issue that a lot of conservatives are trying to start by linking it to trans is a non-starter and to their detriment. Plus it alienates those who hold conservative opinions but like anime.
Lolicon works off a separation of reality and fiction. You can do WHATEVER you want to a drawing, it's a drawing it has no agency but ask the majority of lolicons if they think kids should be sexually active and they'll beat the shit out of you...if they can some really need to exercise more.
Trans LIVES in fiction, thinking that gender can be changed like clothes and that sex is an entitlement to all INCLUDING children with how much they try to include kids in their activities.
Trying to conflate lolicon and trans is like conflating Jews and Muslims. You are taking two groups that hate each other to be both pissed at you and see you as the enemy.
A lot of fucking weirdos are into lolis. It's pedo shit if you jack off to lolis. It just is. Lolis are explicitly designed to appeal to pedos.
I watch anime a lot. My GF is Japanese. It's very transparent that there are a significant number of characters inserted into some shows purely to appeal to fetishes so that the show will sell more to those fetishists. Lolis are designed to appeal to pedos. The more recent "imoto" fetish is a combination of pedophilia & incest. Even Black Clover - a mainstream big title - has a protagonist character who is openly sexually into his little sister.
X: doubt. Not if they're being honest.
This particular tranny is also into lolis. Sexually. Not because he thinks they're cute, but because he likes to masturbate to them. And he does it enough to proudly say it in public. That doesn't mean ALL trannies are like that, but the simple fact is that mentally ill people have comorbidities, so a tranny is much more likely to be into lolis or other forms of sexual deviancy when compared to just a normal sane person.
No and no.
Lolis do not even resemble human beings, let alone human children. Japanese and Japanese-styled art DOMINATES the erotic space while the realism of western art has been utterly sidelined. We haven't seen a millennial Boris Vallejo or Frank Frazetta because eroticism in that style just doesn't sell any more. The Japs blew it the fuck away and relegated it to western women's romance novel book covers.
The overwhelming majority of people jacking off to drawings aren't looking for realism. That's WHY they're jacking off to drawings.
Lolis are 100% intended to resemble human children, just like adult anime women with big tits are intended to resemble human adult women. It doesn't matter that they are not photo-realistic. There is a reason that human males get hard dicks for big anime titties but not for the cast of the Pixar movies Cars or Finding Nemo.
Lolis are carefully crafted to have traits that pedophiles will get triggered by & sexually aroused by. That's why they exist. Same with many other fetish bait tropes like Moe, Tsunderes, Yanderes, and all the others. This is especially true in harem anime but it leaks into mainstream titles as well since the Japanese are taught that putting this shit in their anime = more sales.
A pedo who masturbates to "unrealistic" lolis is still a pedo. I really don't care if you want to argue "b-b-but he's an ethical pedo because he doesn't go after real cp!" I DON'T CARE. HE IS STILL A PEDO. which is all I said to begin with.
They are not just 'not photorealistic', they do not even have human proportions. You're screaming 'pedophile!' at people jacking off to something that looks NOTHING like a human child and has a facial structure literally closer to that of a kitten than a human being.
Your opinions on this are transparently those of an artistic illiterate who has never drawn anything in his life and has zero understanding of or care for how character design/proportion plays with people's brains to create pleasing illusions of things that are simply not there.
This statement is your entire position, sI'm going to succinctly break down how retarded this statement is by translating it into plain English:
'A person who masturbates to something that looks nothing like a human child is a person who is sexually attracted to human children'.