Two questions actually. I'm wondering if you have any relatives or friends like I do posting the usual memes about how right wingers are the real snowflakes because we can't "handle" a beer can with a "trans person" on it. I always hate the "right wingers are the real snowflakes" argument because these are the same people who cry if a show that takes place in 800AD Iceland isn't diverse enough, or literally think it is genocide if you acknowledge the delusions of certain people as objective reality. I know some libertarians say just don't buy it and the market will take care of everything, and I agree to a point, but it has been shown time and time again that companies don't care what the consumers want and there are those who only care about "THE MESSAGE". I can understand people getting sick and tired of the constant pandering to certain demographics (i.e lgbt, black, girl power, etc) that make up tiny percentage of the population. So how do you respond? I get that I can buy something else or watch something else but that doesn't seem to change anything.
Second question: Do you think there are some execs or tv/movie writers who live in such a leftist bubble that they honestly think certain things will be popular or do you think it is all the message? Like I feel like some people at marvel honestly thought that America Chavez or Ironheart were going to be huge sellers and were shocked that they were cancelled. Same thing with the gay Superman. Also in certain heavily blue areas it seems to be trendy to be anything but straight so someone who lives in those areas are probably shocked to see that a movie like Bros bombs. I know ESG has a lot of influence, but I also think some people honestly believe that shows like Rings of Power will be huge hits.
I HOPE BUD FUCKING DIES BECAUSE THEY STOLE THAT NAME FROM MY COUNTRY AND THEY SULLY ITS NAME BY MAKING PISSWATER
No but seriously. I don't have an answer to your first question, but the second one - yes, absolutely. The Bud fiasco itself is a perfect example. I can guarantee you that the horse-faced bitch who came up with it doesn't know a single person who drinks the shit she was in charge of marketing. There was noone in her insulated bubble of "cool wine aunts" who could tell her to stop. And the same principle applies all across the board. It's incredible. Personally, I like to expose myself to libs' talking points, but they can't do the same, they can't read Zerohedge or Unherd or whatever - because their belief systems fall apart the very moment they're confronted with reality, and the cognitive dissonance is painful to them. I guess.
The sad thing is, some of my friends are highly educated and genuinely smart people, but a part of being smart and educated and "worldly" around here is that you've gotta read shit like the NYT and WaPo and The Grauniad and the BBC, and absolutely no counter-narrative media. So they read that garbage, and they unironically accept what these terrible rags tell them, no matter how many times I show them it's bullshit. I've had arguments with them where I actually managed to convince them that something they considered to be true was bullshit - but then a few days later they're back to their original beliefs. It's so frustrating.
Plus that marketing VP bashed the frat boy image of Bud lite but she partied and stuff in college so now she will look down her nose at the very same ppl
Yeah. She is (or was?) in charge of marketing a product she knew nothing about, to a target audience she considers beneath her. There's no good that could possibly come out of that.
Seems this is the current strategy.. denigrate the old fanbase.
This really hits me where it hurts. I've totally been there. Perhaps the most pure NPC behavior I've ever witnessed.