Quite the contrary; Budweiser is already reversing this decision and distancing themselves.
Is this not at odds with the implication that billion dollar companies are so smart and wouldn't make the wrong decision? Or is the idea that all of this, including them backing down, is part of their grand plan?
Y'know, it's amazing how many people will like and share the Stone Toss meme, "Are you sure this will help sell more burgers?," and understand that it has nothing to do with making money and everything to do with pushing an agenda, but then go and actually question whether replacing Whites with Blacks and putting a Tranny on Budweiser beer is actually them believing that they would make money and it was "capitalism in full effect."
FFS, have y'all not learned ANYTHING or are you just trolls/shills?
I'm honestly done debating this. What a fucking waste of time.
it has nothing to do with making money and everything to do with pushing an agenda
Hmm, has anyone here argued against that? In the meme the guy pushing the interracial ad is the subversive. He's not the one running the company. Of course in real life he doesn't actually reply to questioning with "Burgers?" but strongly convinces the people running the company that it WILL make them more money in the long run.
You're getting tripped up on the subtle distinction between the corporation as a whole and the horsefaced bitch who pulled the trigger on that retardation. I dont have any doubt at all she was out to push an agenda. I have plenty of doubt that this entire debacle is all part of some grand plan by Bud Light. Funnily enough this distinction is also present in the Stonetoss analogy you brought up lmfao.
And how was it pushed exactly? The people who'd agree already agreed, and the people who hated it become multiplicatively enraged about the entire tranny nonsense. Many of whom were likely uncaring prior simply because it didn't effect their bud, race, wrestling lifestyle. Demographically, there aren't a lot of "on the fence, centrist" Bud drinkers.
So is it a 5d chess Reichstag Fire to create more tranny hate?
Y'know, it's amazing how many people will like and share the Stone Toss meme, "Are you sure this will help sell more burgers?," and understand that it has nothing to do with making money and everything to do with pushing an agenda, but then go and actually question whether replacing Whites with Blacks and putting a Tranny on Budweiser beer is actually them believing that they would make money and it was "capitalism in full effect."
FFS, have y'all not learned ANYTHING or are you just trolls/shills?
I'm honestly done debating this. What a fucking waste of time.
Nobody is questioning an agenda was at play. Everyone is questioning your dumb idea that they are perfect geniuses who expertly played everyone with a plan going exactly as prepared. Only actual retards believe a tranny beer accomplishes more sales.
The point is to get you to actually explain it, since you apparently have all the answers, but you instead keep using vague generalizations instead.
Also, quoting yourself like a bitch is pretty weak my guy. As is "everyone who doesn't agree with me is a shill!"
Is this not at odds with the implication that billion dollar companies are so smart and wouldn't make the wrong decision? Or is the idea that all of this, including them backing down, is part of their grand plan?
Y'know, it's amazing how many people will like and share the Stone Toss meme, "Are you sure this will help sell more burgers?," and understand that it has nothing to do with making money and everything to do with pushing an agenda, but then go and actually question whether replacing Whites with Blacks and putting a Tranny on Budweiser beer is actually them believing that they would make money and it was "capitalism in full effect."
FFS, have y'all not learned ANYTHING or are you just trolls/shills?
I'm honestly done debating this. What a fucking waste of time.
Hmm, has anyone here argued against that? In the meme the guy pushing the interracial ad is the subversive. He's not the one running the company. Of course in real life he doesn't actually reply to questioning with "Burgers?" but strongly convinces the people running the company that it WILL make them more money in the long run.
You're getting tripped up on the subtle distinction between the corporation as a whole and the horsefaced bitch who pulled the trigger on that retardation. I dont have any doubt at all she was out to push an agenda. I have plenty of doubt that this entire debacle is all part of some grand plan by Bud Light. Funnily enough this distinction is also present in the Stonetoss analogy you brought up lmfao.
Go back to reddit.
I'm a Southerner. Fuck off back to your northern liberal shithole city, you fucking faggot.
It's perfectly aligned with that they know exactly what they're doing, and it's not about making money, it's about pushing an agenda.
And how was it pushed exactly? The people who'd agree already agreed, and the people who hated it become multiplicatively enraged about the entire tranny nonsense. Many of whom were likely uncaring prior simply because it didn't effect their bud, race, wrestling lifestyle. Demographically, there aren't a lot of "on the fence, centrist" Bud drinkers.
So is it a 5d chess Reichstag Fire to create more tranny hate?
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16an0n3y0D/redditors-also-want-you-to-belie/c/4TsaJCjMCm4
Nobody is questioning an agenda was at play. Everyone is questioning your dumb idea that they are perfect geniuses who expertly played everyone with a plan going exactly as prepared. Only actual retards believe a tranny beer accomplishes more sales.
The point is to get you to actually explain it, since you apparently have all the answers, but you instead keep using vague generalizations instead.
Also, quoting yourself like a bitch is pretty weak my guy. As is "everyone who doesn't agree with me is a shill!"