Obvious answer: institutional backing.
But I wonder why troons succeeded in garnering this kind of support while furries failed. I pull a complete blank on why. If anything, the ridiculousness of denying one's own gender is just as ridiculous as denying one's own species.
The similarities are uncanny:
- Origins in the pride/gay rights bullshit
- Delusions of self: "I am not what I am, I am what I imagine."
- Cluster effect: exposure to trannies creates trannies, just like exposure to furries creates furries.
- Insufferable personalities and overbearing self-inserting into normal spaces.
- Claiming negative reactions of the previous point as prosecution. "Literal Trans Genocide" vs "Fursecution"
- Expensive conversion to one's perfect form: Chopadickectomy vs full body Fursuit.
- Abject degenerate sexual tendencies with zero self restraint
- Subversive even to the concept of normality, seemingly proud to be a deviant.
- Riddled with mental illness: anxiety, depression, prone to violence
Who knew that just preferring to take it up the butt or scissor action can be more tolerated, especially when they just accept the initial backlash, than your premise being you want to maim and mutilate OTHER people's kids? Colour me shocked!
Dark humour aside, because the troons have used the establishment to get a foothold, maintain and silence those in opposition, they've moved past where the backlash might be forcing them to be more private or be viewed as outcasts like the gays were, it'll be a full on revolution and uprising against a hostile power like you'll see in previously authoritarian states.