It's not editorialized, he literally claimed that.
He said that joint custody agreements would violate the Florida Constitution, in accordance with the arguments from his masters who need to be able to use their bargaining chip to maximize wealth.
DeSantis is also supported by the Congressional Family Caucus (worthless pro-marriage parasites) and by Chip Roy, who supported the impeachment of President Trump over the Ukraine call, but voted against it to save his ass.
Is it really fair to call divorce decrees contracts? Contracts at their core are mutually beneficial agreements arrived at freely and without coercion. Unless the divorce terms were agreed to by the parties and the court's only role was to sign off on it they're not arrived at freely and they're sure as shit not mutually beneficial.
This isn't me agreeing with Imp about the veto btw. There very may well be ex post facto issues with the law, and DeSantis is a lawyer so he would have a good idea of whether it would hold up. If he thought it would be struck down it makes sense that he would veto it to save the state litigation costs. I just don't think the typical divorce can be fairly described as a contract.
I meant that marriage is a contract. If you contract a marriage under the understanding that you are entitled to X amount of alimony if you devote your life to the marriage rather than making money for some corporation, and politicians then unilaterally abrogated that, it does not seem fair to me.
It was about alimony and custody agreements, I'm pretty sure. It was supposed to finally fix the divorce courts, and nothing scares the enemy more than that.
I'm sure if they had the majority, they would have blocked it. They got some concessions out of it, as the enemy always does - IIRC, some kind of one year minimum for alimony to "help the woman get back on her feet".
There were also meetings between Ronald and women's groups leading up to the veto.
Because they were promised that adultery wouldn't count against them in court. I'm not kidding. They had to add that to get women to vote for it. Nothing speaks louder than that about what they are.
No, I'm sure there are a lot of irrelevant state senates that women don't care enough about.
Can't find it. I know I've seen it. I even remember the name of the woman. Barbara DeVane. She spoke with DeSantis about the bill on behalf of the NOW.
It's not editorialized, he literally claimed that.
He said that joint custody agreements would violate the Florida Constitution, in accordance with the arguments from his masters who need to be able to use their bargaining chip to maximize wealth.
DeSantis is also supported by the Congressional Family Caucus (worthless pro-marriage parasites) and by Chip Roy, who supported the impeachment of President Trump over the Ukraine call, but voted against it to save his ass.
Yes, retroactively modifying a contract is unconstitutional. It wasn't about joint custody either, I remember.
Why are you defending a bill that WOMEN in the Florida GOP caucus voted for? You are a TRAITOR.
Is it really fair to call divorce decrees contracts? Contracts at their core are mutually beneficial agreements arrived at freely and without coercion. Unless the divorce terms were agreed to by the parties and the court's only role was to sign off on it they're not arrived at freely and they're sure as shit not mutually beneficial.
This isn't me agreeing with Imp about the veto btw. There very may well be ex post facto issues with the law, and DeSantis is a lawyer so he would have a good idea of whether it would hold up. If he thought it would be struck down it makes sense that he would veto it to save the state litigation costs. I just don't think the typical divorce can be fairly described as a contract.
I meant that marriage is a contract. If you contract a marriage under the understanding that you are entitled to X amount of alimony if you devote your life to the marriage rather than making money for some corporation, and politicians then unilaterally abrogated that, it does not seem fair to me.
It was about alimony and custody agreements, I'm pretty sure. It was supposed to finally fix the divorce courts, and nothing scares the enemy more than that.
I'm sure if they had the majority, they would have blocked it. They got some concessions out of it, as the enemy always does - IIRC, some kind of one year minimum for alimony to "help the woman get back on her feet".
There were also meetings between Ronald and women's groups leading up to the veto.
So you're already changing your story.
Why did women vote for it? You are a TRAITOR.
So DeSantis' Florida is the only place in Florida not "controlled by women"?
Feel free to produce the receipts for that one.
I'm not changing my story, I just chose the most hard-hitting part.
Because they were promised that adultery wouldn't count against them in court. I'm not kidding. They had to add that to get women to vote for it. Nothing speaks louder than that about what they are.
No, I'm sure there are a lot of irrelevant state senates that women don't care enough about.
Can't find it. I know I've seen it. I even remember the name of the woman. Barbara DeVane. She spoke with DeSantis about the bill on behalf of the NOW.