Compared to 2021, the number of deaths has increased by more than 140,000.
Compared to 2020, the number of deaths has increased by a staggering number of 210,000
Just in the reported cases alone, there have been as many as 2001 cases of suspected vaccine-induced deaths.
Then, according to the health minister, there are 52 cases where a pathologist has performed an autopsy, and reported that there is a link between the vaccine and the death.
Yet, only one case has been found to have a causal relationship between the vaccine and death
Amazingly, even though more than 2000 people have died after vaccination, more than 99% of this deaths cannot be evaluated due to allegedly insufficient information.
For example, a man in his 30s, died three days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine. The cause of death was myocarditis. Myocarditis is a commonly recognized as a typical adverse reaction cost by the Covid vaccine. Furthermore, as a result of the autopsy, doctors concluded that there was a link between the vaccine and the death.
Even in such an obvious case, the evaluation committee, made up of a group of amateur academics paid for by the government declared that they could not evaluate causation due to the lack of information.
For comparison, it seems like the '2000' deaths number comes from their equivalent of VAERS, to my understanding...? Which if their system is anything like VAERS, means that it's already massively undercounted, from anywhere between 10x-100x. Given that one of the Veritas leaks suggested that a major factor in underreporting to VAERS was the burdensome bureaucracy of filing a report (half an hour in the day of a busy clinician), and also that Japan is the very home of burdensome bureaucracy, I'm prepared to believe that similar underreporting is going on.
Normies are shielded from the real number of deaths by 2-3 layers of implausible deniability. 1 death is a number you clutch to heart if you're fully paid up to all things Safe and Effective. Start to mistrust things a bit, and 50 is a number that prevents you from having to consider 2000. 2000 is a number which saves you from the level of mistrust you really should be feeling, which leads to realms of 200k and more. This has shown to be effective in controlling cattle-apes worldwide, and should be all the more effective in Japan, the land of herdthink, but it could be interesting should their group mentality butt up against a sense of aggrieved national pride at being decimated by foreign poison.
The ending quote of the article is equally damning:
Prof. Fukushima added, “Vaccines are four times more likely to be infected than non-vaccinated people. Mortality rates were also found to be higher among vaccinated people of all ages. The evidence to promote vaccination has been lost. The state has hidden and stopped disclosing inconvenient data. It is a serious national crisis.”
For comparison, it seems like the '2000' deaths number comes from their equivalent of VAERS, to my understanding...? Which if their system is anything like VAERS, means that it's already massively undercounted, from anywhere between 10x-100x. Given that one of the Veritas leaks suggested that a major factor in underreporting to VAERS was the burdensome bureaucracy of filing a report (half an hour in the day of a busy clinician), and also that Japan is the very home of burdensome bureaucracy, I'm prepared to believe that similar underreporting is going on.
Normies are shielded from the real number of deaths by 2-3 layers of implausible deniability. 1 death is a number you clutch to heart if you're fully paid up to all things Safe and Effective. Start to mistrust things a bit, and 50 is a number that prevents you from having to consider 2000. 2000 is a number which saves you from the level of mistrust you really should be feeling, which leads to realms of 200k and more. This has shown to be effective in controlling cattle-apes worldwide, and should be all the more effective in Japan, the land of herdthink, but it could be interesting should their group mentality butt up against a sense of aggrieved national pride at being decimated by foreign poison.
The ending quote of the article is equally damning:
Harvard ran a study a few decades ago about VAERS reporting and found 1% of adverse effects get reported.
So whatever VAERS is saying multiply that by 100 to get the real number.
And this is