You cannot have 'live and let live' without repealing the civil rights act, the most egregious infringement on the freedom of association in US history. Norms are established and maintained through behavior. Limiting how I can respond will affect norms.
I actually agree with this, freedom of association is as important as other freedoms and infringing on it is egregious. Especially when it's only enforced in one direction. It's commonplace for businesses to discriminate against white males, or for someone other than a white person (or maybe an Asian person) to hire only people of their race. It's commonplace to have clubs or groups that are only for women or for a certain race or sexual minority, you can't do it for white straight men though.
You cannot have 'live and let live' without repealing the civil rights act, the most egregious infringement on the freedom of association in US history. Norms are established and maintained through behavior. Limiting how I can respond will affect norms.
I actually agree with this, freedom of association is as important as other freedoms and infringing on it is egregious. Especially when it's only enforced in one direction. It's commonplace for businesses to discriminate against white males, or for someone other than a white person (or maybe an Asian person) to hire only people of their race. It's commonplace to have clubs or groups that are only for women or for a certain race or sexual minority, you can't do it for white straight men though.
Lol no. Forcing people to use separate government facilities is not freedom of association. That's a retarded example