No it's not. Women's argument against men is based around accidentally acknowledging their inferiority in violence, and thereby demanding privilege to compensate for their weakness.
The argument against troons is that the very concept of their existence was conjured out of thin air by a pedophile jew not once but twice in the past century, and that their demographic commits child molestation in ab amount so outsized for their proportion of the population that any of them who don't are literally a statistical outlier.
Isn't that literally women's argument against men?
They take the worst of us, and say it defines everyone.
Is it really right to do it against others?
My point isn't that we should embrace the ideology, but that we should categorize these people as women's victims and try to break their conditioning.
They are quite happy to sit behind us, cheering us on when we attack the trannies and that's an obvious sign that we're making the wrong move.
It's the ideology, created by women, that needs to go. The people need help.
No it's not. Women's argument against men is based around accidentally acknowledging their inferiority in violence, and thereby demanding privilege to compensate for their weakness.
The argument against troons is that the very concept of their existence was conjured out of thin air by a pedophile jew not once but twice in the past century, and that their demographic commits child molestation in ab amount so outsized for their proportion of the population that any of them who don't are literally a statistical outlier.