We can't even get men to let women suffer the consequences of pushing to castrate little boys. Even here, people simp for subhuman pro-murder trash like JK Rowling.
They own the schools. That control must be broken.
He's a lunatic, but in this, he's right. One of the most isolating parts of being a reactionary in the 2020s is being one of the very few who cannot lie about trannies. The demand that we submit to their power games is like being regularly demanded that we call the grass purple and the sky neon green. Most people can see through it, whether or not they want to admit it, but they're too afraid to go against the grain.
TERFs get a lot of leeway from reactionaries because they're one of the few groups that are also willing to acknowledge plain fucking reality. We're deep enough into clown world at this point that it really doesn't take much. But reactionaries give them too much credit when we agree on this. Even the average, lukewarm radfem like Rowling will always see men as lesser beings. I've called it the "holy uterus" because they really just feel that femininity is holy and masculinity is degenerate, like a new-age religion. You can't separate their ideology from the anti-masculine direction our culture has taken, and so no matter how refreshing it is to see somebody else tell trannies off, they still deserve the Minecraft cannon.
Because the foundational belief of TERFs is that everyone born male is entirely irredeemable, no matter what they do.
The difference between them and other feminists is that other feminists believe males can be part of their society if they defer to women enough, while TERFs like Rowling would bludgeon a baby to death for being male without a second thought.
Both sides are fucking evil, don't misunderstand me, but it makes more sense for a man to side with those who say he can be redeemed somehow.
We can't even get men to let women suffer the consequences of pushing to castrate little boys. Even here, people simp for subhuman pro-murder trash like JK Rowling.
They own the schools. That control must be broken.
Yah, I don't subscribe to your definition of simping (not hating every woman except your mother with every fiber of your body)
He's a lunatic, but in this, he's right. One of the most isolating parts of being a reactionary in the 2020s is being one of the very few who cannot lie about trannies. The demand that we submit to their power games is like being regularly demanded that we call the grass purple and the sky neon green. Most people can see through it, whether or not they want to admit it, but they're too afraid to go against the grain.
TERFs get a lot of leeway from reactionaries because they're one of the few groups that are also willing to acknowledge plain fucking reality. We're deep enough into clown world at this point that it really doesn't take much. But reactionaries give them too much credit when we agree on this. Even the average, lukewarm radfem like Rowling will always see men as lesser beings. I've called it the "holy uterus" because they really just feel that femininity is holy and masculinity is degenerate, like a new-age religion. You can't separate their ideology from the anti-masculine direction our culture has taken, and so no matter how refreshing it is to see somebody else tell trannies off, they still deserve the Minecraft cannon.
You can't deny that there's nothing more contradictory than a male TERF.
How is that more contradictory than being a 'normal' male feminist?
Because the foundational belief of TERFs is that everyone born male is entirely irredeemable, no matter what they do.
The difference between them and other feminists is that other feminists believe males can be part of their society if they defer to women enough, while TERFs like Rowling would bludgeon a baby to death for being male without a second thought.
Both sides are fucking evil, don't misunderstand me, but it makes more sense for a man to side with those who say he can be redeemed somehow.