Because the foundational belief of TERFs is that everyone born male is entirely irredeemable, no matter what they do.
The difference between them and other feminists is that other feminists believe males can be part of their society if they defer to women enough, while TERFs like Rowling would bludgeon a baby to death for being male without a second thought.
Both sides are fucking evil, don't misunderstand me, but it makes more sense for a man to side with those who say he can be redeemed somehow.
To redeem yourself to the other side you have to give up everything that makes you a man. That's just as evil.
Especially since both sides actually crave men. Specifically the top 10%, which is (not really) coincidentally the number of men they want to keep, if they had it their way.
Fair point. Is breaking someone mentally worse than killing them? That's a complex moral debate.
No they don't. 10% is just their arbitrary figure to prevent the accusation that they wish for humanity's extinction. If you ever read these manifestos, you will see that they don't ever have the men come in contact with women. They are held in captivity far away, and milked for their semen from adulthood until they die.
How is that more contradictory than being a 'normal' male feminist?
Because the foundational belief of TERFs is that everyone born male is entirely irredeemable, no matter what they do.
The difference between them and other feminists is that other feminists believe males can be part of their society if they defer to women enough, while TERFs like Rowling would bludgeon a baby to death for being male without a second thought.
Both sides are fucking evil, don't misunderstand me, but it makes more sense for a man to side with those who say he can be redeemed somehow.
To redeem yourself to the other side you have to give up everything that makes you a man. That's just as evil.
Especially since both sides actually crave men. Specifically the top 10%, which is (not really) coincidentally the number of men they want to keep, if they had it their way.
Fair point. Is breaking someone mentally worse than killing them? That's a complex moral debate.
No they don't. 10% is just their arbitrary figure to prevent the accusation that they wish for humanity's extinction. If you ever read these manifestos, you will see that they don't ever have the men come in contact with women. They are held in captivity far away, and milked for their semen from adulthood until they die.