Imp is right here, at least for Western nations. Teachers, both male and female, generally give better grades to girls than boys in cases of equal quality work. Blind marking has been shown to improve the scores of boys and decrease the scores of girls. Teachers also give more praise to female students, girls have higher rates of literacy, enrolment in AP and gifted classes, and are more likely to graduate. Of course, they're then accepted into post-secondary college and university programs at higher rates than men.
Girls are easily pressured through shame and social elements, meaning the type of discipline teachers employ is far more effective on them. Which means they act up less, so they are able to do more work and don't get pettily focused on as much for being "troublemakers." Which usually ends up in the boy getting removed from classwork more, growing resentful and then the vicious cycle starts. And that's not even getting into boy's inherent higher energy (and the need to burn it off) and instinctual hierarchical attitudes (which means they need to fight it out with each other at times, instead of getting suspended for every little push).
Point of all that being, even the one's that aren't deliberately trying to push ideology or activism are still contributing to the problem. There are no "the good ones." Only the malicious and the ignorant.
Teachers, both male and female, generally give better grades to girls than boys in cases of equal quality work.
Because the only men that can survive women's culture in education are the "feminist ally" traitor trash.
Blind marking has been shown to improve the scores of boys and decrease the scores of girls. Teachers also give more praise to female students, girls have higher rates of literacy, enrolment in AP and gifted classes, and are more likely to graduate. Of course, they're then accepted into post-secondary college and university programs at higher rates than men.
Nothing they have achieved is legitimate. They've just created an insular system that allows them to promote each other and help the sisterhood.
Because you're a boy.
Imp is right here, at least for Western nations. Teachers, both male and female, generally give better grades to girls than boys in cases of equal quality work. Blind marking has been shown to improve the scores of boys and decrease the scores of girls. Teachers also give more praise to female students, girls have higher rates of literacy, enrolment in AP and gifted classes, and are more likely to graduate. Of course, they're then accepted into post-secondary college and university programs at higher rates than men.
Girls are easily pressured through shame and social elements, meaning the type of discipline teachers employ is far more effective on them. Which means they act up less, so they are able to do more work and don't get pettily focused on as much for being "troublemakers." Which usually ends up in the boy getting removed from classwork more, growing resentful and then the vicious cycle starts. And that's not even getting into boy's inherent higher energy (and the need to burn it off) and instinctual hierarchical attitudes (which means they need to fight it out with each other at times, instead of getting suspended for every little push).
Point of all that being, even the one's that aren't deliberately trying to push ideology or activism are still contributing to the problem. There are no "the good ones." Only the malicious and the ignorant.
And after creating that hostile of an enviroment for boys, one where girls thrive in, they STILL mark boys down and girls up.
#AllWomensAchievementsAreFake
Because the only men that can survive women's culture in education are the "feminist ally" traitor trash.
Nothing they have achieved is legitimate. They've just created an insular system that allows them to promote each other and help the sisterhood.