Pertinent quote from the results section of the publication:
Most people who come from a socio-economically less favorable background do not commit more crime than people who come from a more favorable background, and it also happens that people from a more favorable background do commit crime. This means that even if there is a connection between socio-economic background and involvement in crime, that connection is weak. It is not possible to appreciably predict who will commit crimes based on knowledge of people's socio-economic background.
https://bra.se/publikationer/arkiv/publikationer/2023-03-01-socioekonomisk-bakgrund-och-brott.html
I have a feeling that IQ plays a bigger role than we might initially think. Why else would wealthy black people commit more crime than poor whites?
We all know that most black people have an extremely short fuse. They are ready to throw their life away over the smallest sign of disrespect.
I think natural inclination for violence is probably separate from IQ. I remember one study where some gene that makes people more violent was found to be much more prevalent in black people.
yup it's combination of low iq and low impulse control. there are plenty of low iq people in India and Asia, they also commit more crimes than the average, but not at the level of blacks
Definitely.
I went to a school that was almost exclusively white (it has since been radically diversified) and there were the same number of violent assholes in the top classes as there were in the bottom ones.
They made better decisions about where and when to jump you, and had a better idea of how much they could get away with without the school escalating the incident to the police, but they were absolutely just as inclined to violence as their dumber counterparts.
They were about 1 in 15 students.
The warrior gene. I want to take a test and see if I have got it. Just for shits and giggles.
They need to call it the KANGZ gene.
DNApe