It's not new, with all the American humanitarian aid to Africa (more than any other country),
Slow tap... it's called influence buying. You are smart enough to know what "foreign aid" is, so don't pretend to be dumb. Or are you going to tell me that the food exports of the USSR from its own starving citizens to its satellites in the aftermath of WW2 were also "humanitarian"?
The Americans even feed the Palestinians, who obsessively hate the literal hand that feeds them.
I mean, I'm pro-Israel, but given the fact that the Americans support Israel rather strongly, they were not exactly wrong to hate the Americans. The Americans feed them so that they will remain pacified. Panem et circensis, member?
Yanuk became a puppet at that moment, which is why he followed on the idiotic order from Russia to have the Maidan shot up to pacify the unrest
Do you have any proof of any such 'order from Russia'? What's more, you know full well that there is controversy about who shot at those Maidan protesters.
It worked for Russian regime in 1993 to just massacre uppity citizens (and a lot of random bystanders) in the streets of Moscow but it's not Russia.
You mean when the American-backed Yeltsin had tanks shoot at the Supreme Soviet after it voted to impeach him, and the Americans then wrote a new constitution for Russia which made the situation even worse (though it ironically paved the way for Putin)?
Btw his own former mentor Kuchma is an Ukrainian patriot.
Also a murderer. Note that Kuchma did manage to play nice and not get invaded, which cannot be said of the Western puppets who have ruled Ukraine since 1994.
BTW, Yanukovich was from Donetsk, so he was Donbas patriot.
Not the EU but us, and not a coup but a revolution. The military stayed in the barracks all the time and took no sides.
When an armed mob takes over the government, that's a coup, whether or not "the military" is involved.
Again, unlike in Russia. And the architect of the missile blitz against Ukraine is the only officer who had killed people in Moscow during the 1991 coup.
So a guy who wasn't completely useless?
Never in my life I even heard about "Guy Verhofstadt". I just checked out and he's not even an American, much less a Neocon brand of Republicans. It seems that the word "neocon" is for you what "nazi" is for American libs and Russian commies.
America isn't starving, and when America was starving they weren't a food exporter.
Palestinians are never pacified, they're always super agitated about America. If they starved to death without (American) food they would be calmer.
They don't make almost any their own food (especially in Gaza which is all urban, and it used to be a small town before they multiplied since 1956) and they don't export anything. They're also not being fed by their supposed protectors the Iranians, who had the IRG's very own SCIRI militias in Iraq ethnically cleansed the Palestinians and no one cared. (I mean, I did care more than an average Muslim or even the other Palestinians, and Palestinians are almost as good as oppressing each other as they're being oppressed by other Arabs who are ridicalously ruthless against them.)
Yanuk was from Donetsk, and yet he fled to Moscow. Hm.
The new Ukrainian government was formed by the existing parliament. Unlike the case of the Mongol style tyranny in Moscow, there were no tank units ready for him to shoot up the parliament just because the deputies wanted him out of power.
He was never "useless", he was always ready to commit any crime anywhere. In Moscow, in Syria, in Ukraine, anything anywhere. This is how he made his career.
America isn't starving, and when America was starving they weren't a food exporter.
Curious response. Explain to me how 'food exports' in order to buy influence, which you know full well is happening, is actually altruism.
Palestinians are never pacified, they're always super agitated about America. If they starved to death without (American) food they would be calmer.
Unlikely. People revolt when they are starving, especially when living in close proximity to an oasis in the desert.
Yanuk was from Donetsk, and yet he fled to Moscow. Hm.
I'm not sure you'd flee to a war zone that would only reinforce the inclination of the government to treat its own alleged citizens as 'terrorists'.
The new Ukrainian government was formed by the existing parliament.
While armed gangs were walking through it. Even in ancient Rome any law that was carried by force (per vim) was invalid.
Unlike the case of the Mongol style tyranny in Moscow, there were no tank units ready for him to shoot up the parliament just because the deputies wanted him out of power.
You mean the Mongol style tyranny of the American friend Boris Yeltsin? I agree he was bad, because he ruined his country. The Americans never seemed to think that, because he was a useless drunk who would let him get away with everything.
He was never "useless", he was always ready to commit any crime anywhere. In Moscow, in Syria, in Ukraine, anything anywhere. This is how he made his career.
The others were, because they apparently did nothing to uphold the government of the August coup leaders. In retrospect, it would probably have been much better if they had succeeded, and then gradually reformed the state instead of driving it off a cliff like Gorbachev and Yeltsin did.
You talked about the Soviet ruthlessness. And they stole everything from us, including people (in family too, made a literal slave).
Not exports, but givaways. And it's similar how the US Navy guards the shipping lines for everyone, not just for America.
The entire global state of peace and prosperity, unprecedented in the entire human history, is the Pax Americana.
That's funny to mention because whenever Palestinians revolt in Arab countries they are always massacred and/or expelled. Most recently Assad starved and shelled them into submission in their "refugee camp" cities. No one really cared because neither America nor Israel were involved, not even the Hamas in the PA (it was the Hamas in Syria rebelling). Btw, America normally feeds them in Syria too. Like everywhere. And takes them to America, and into the Congress, and they're still as ungrateful as ever.
Not really, no. Just Sashko Billy was waddling around armed with his AKSU, saying in his videos how he's working to weed up corruption of the prosecutors, so he quickly ended up murdered by the cops (shot himself in chest while fleeing arrest with his hands handcuffed behind his back).
And when his RS friends tried to actually stage a coup in like 2016, only a few of them were armed (there were a few shootouts) but the rest again showed up with their bats and chains, despite a lot of them being war veterans at this point and all sorts of military weapons being really easy to obtain one way or another. It was more cringe than the Beer Hall Putsch. You probably didn't even notice.
So anyway the protesters outside the Rada were unarmed. You could see for yourself if you bothered. And unlike "America's worst day ever", didn't even break windows.
Donetsk when he fled was no "war zone" whatsoever. It was Kyiv Maidan that was "war zone" (not even the rest of city center). Elsewhere there was literally nothing going on. There were some brawls involving the Automaidan vs the Titushki and what not. Such "war zone" like the American fights between Antifa and the Proud Boys. Donetsk Troubles didn't even start until after Crimea happened.
Americans should have never trying befriending Russia. Should never try to help in any way if it collapses again. Only contain.
The 1991 coup buried the Soviet Union. All the other republics (and Chechnya) really seceded at this moment when it happened, not when it failed. If it "succeeded" (in Moscow), you would have Chechnya everywhere. Btw, every single region of Ukraine voted for the independence afterwards. Crimea too, even if by far the least (like 51%).
Might be less serious in practice than I remember, beyond just the Second Revolution style rhetoric of seizing power one way or another that went nowhere (and in the next elections RS and allies won 0 seats despite forming single bloc, because population got tired of their antics).
Slow tap... it's called influence buying. You are smart enough to know what "foreign aid" is, so don't pretend to be dumb. Or are you going to tell me that the food exports of the USSR from its own starving citizens to its satellites in the aftermath of WW2 were also "humanitarian"?
I mean, I'm pro-Israel, but given the fact that the Americans support Israel rather strongly, they were not exactly wrong to hate the Americans. The Americans feed them so that they will remain pacified. Panem et circensis, member?
Do you have any proof of any such 'order from Russia'? What's more, you know full well that there is controversy about who shot at those Maidan protesters.
You mean when the American-backed Yeltsin had tanks shoot at the Supreme Soviet after it voted to impeach him, and the Americans then wrote a new constitution for Russia which made the situation even worse (though it ironically paved the way for Putin)?
Also a murderer. Note that Kuchma did manage to play nice and not get invaded, which cannot be said of the Western puppets who have ruled Ukraine since 1994.
BTW, Yanukovich was from Donetsk, so he was Donbas patriot.
When an armed mob takes over the government, that's a coup, whether or not "the military" is involved.
So a guy who wasn't completely useless?
How can you not have heard of that vile creep?
America isn't starving, and when America was starving they weren't a food exporter.
Palestinians are never pacified, they're always super agitated about America. If they starved to death without (American) food they would be calmer.
They don't make almost any their own food (especially in Gaza which is all urban, and it used to be a small town before they multiplied since 1956) and they don't export anything. They're also not being fed by their supposed protectors the Iranians, who had the IRG's very own SCIRI militias in Iraq ethnically cleansed the Palestinians and no one cared. (I mean, I did care more than an average Muslim or even the other Palestinians, and Palestinians are almost as good as oppressing each other as they're being oppressed by other Arabs who are ridicalously ruthless against them.)
Yanuk was from Donetsk, and yet he fled to Moscow. Hm.
The new Ukrainian government was formed by the existing parliament. Unlike the case of the Mongol style tyranny in Moscow, there were no tank units ready for him to shoot up the parliament just because the deputies wanted him out of power.
He was never "useless", he was always ready to commit any crime anywhere. In Moscow, in Syria, in Ukraine, anything anywhere. This is how he made his career.
Curious response. Explain to me how 'food exports' in order to buy influence, which you know full well is happening, is actually altruism.
Unlikely. People revolt when they are starving, especially when living in close proximity to an oasis in the desert.
I'm not sure you'd flee to a war zone that would only reinforce the inclination of the government to treat its own alleged citizens as 'terrorists'.
While armed gangs were walking through it. Even in ancient Rome any law that was carried by force (per vim) was invalid.
You mean the Mongol style tyranny of the American friend Boris Yeltsin? I agree he was bad, because he ruined his country. The Americans never seemed to think that, because he was a useless drunk who would let him get away with everything.
The others were, because they apparently did nothing to uphold the government of the August coup leaders. In retrospect, it would probably have been much better if they had succeeded, and then gradually reformed the state instead of driving it off a cliff like Gorbachev and Yeltsin did.
You talked about the Soviet ruthlessness. And they stole everything from us, including people (in family too, made a literal slave).
Not exports, but givaways. And it's similar how the US Navy guards the shipping lines for everyone, not just for America.
The entire global state of peace and prosperity, unprecedented in the entire human history, is the Pax Americana.
That's funny to mention because whenever Palestinians revolt in Arab countries they are always massacred and/or expelled. Most recently Assad starved and shelled them into submission in their "refugee camp" cities. No one really cared because neither America nor Israel were involved, not even the Hamas in the PA (it was the Hamas in Syria rebelling). Btw, America normally feeds them in Syria too. Like everywhere. And takes them to America, and into the Congress, and they're still as ungrateful as ever.
Not really, no. Just Sashko Billy was waddling around armed with his AKSU, saying in his videos how he's working to weed up corruption of the prosecutors, so he quickly ended up murdered by the cops (shot himself in chest while fleeing arrest with his hands handcuffed behind his back).
And when his RS friends tried to actually stage a coup in like 2016, only a few of them were armed (there were a few shootouts) but the rest again showed up with their bats and chains, despite a lot of them being war veterans at this point and all sorts of military weapons being really easy to obtain one way or another. It was more cringe than the Beer Hall Putsch. You probably didn't even notice.
So anyway the protesters outside the Rada were unarmed. You could see for yourself if you bothered. And unlike "America's worst day ever", didn't even break windows.
Donetsk when he fled was no "war zone" whatsoever. It was Kyiv Maidan that was "war zone" (not even the rest of city center). Elsewhere there was literally nothing going on. There were some brawls involving the Automaidan vs the Titushki and what not. Such "war zone" like the American fights between Antifa and the Proud Boys. Donetsk Troubles didn't even start until after Crimea happened.
Americans should have never trying befriending Russia. Should never try to help in any way if it collapses again. Only contain.
The 1991 coup buried the Soviet Union. All the other republics (and Chechnya) really seceded at this moment when it happened, not when it failed. If it "succeeded" (in Moscow), you would have Chechnya everywhere. Btw, every single region of Ukraine voted for the independence afterwards. Crimea too, even if by far the least (like 51%).
It was actually in 2015. Stuff like
https://www.rferl.org/a/right-sector-standoff-ukraine-shootout/27124178.html
https://www.euractiv.com/section/eu-russia/news/poroshenko-brands-parliament-attack-a-stab-in-the-back/
Might be less serious in practice than I remember, beyond just the Second Revolution style rhetoric of seizing power one way or another that went nowhere (and in the next elections RS and allies won 0 seats despite forming single bloc, because population got tired of their antics).