Roald Dahl was even sterner. In a letter to The Times of London, Dahl called Rushdie "a dangerous opportunist," saying he "must have been totally aware of the deep and violent feelings his book would stir up among devout Muslims. In other words, he knew exactly what he was doing and cannot plead otherwise. This kind of sensationalism does indeed get an indifferent book on to the top of the best-seller list, — but to my mind it is a cheap way of doing it." The author of dark children's books and stories for adults (who himself once had police protection after getting death threats) also advocated self-censorship. It "puts a severe strain on the very power principle that the writer has an absolute right to say what he likes," he wrote. "In a civilized world we all have a moral obligation to apply a modicum of censorship to our own work in order to reinforce this principle of free speech."
https://archive.is/tToBq#selection-452.0-452.1
Now, Salman Rushdie is defending the authentic version of Dahl's works. Well, you got better than you deserved in death, Dahl.
I don't think anyone's books should be censored, but if someone's books are to be censored I want them to start with the people calling for books to be censored. To be fair he said self-censored.
Much like the Shariah push by muslims. Let it apply to muslims, and only muslims. Will be interesting to see how quickly they recoil once their parts are getting amputated.