So they'll be a ton of illegal guns then? There's WAY too many guns, manufacturers both public businesses and private hobbyist and stores of guns that you have NO WAY of enforcing any kind measure like this.
And judging what happened previously, sheriffs and police departments will tell you to go fuck yourself in trying to enforce it and the ATF are too scared to do it themselves since they'll have no one to hide behind.
The idea appears to be that the Biden administration will de facto revoke the second amendment by removing any and all places where you might purchase a firearm, and doing it using a Federal agency that isn't beholden to any kind of local pressure.
Bear in mind that the same people are also mulling quite how they can ban 80%ers without getting themselves a new orifice torn by the Supreme Court.
In the state of Missouri they passed a law that says any police officer who helps the ATF enforce a federal gun law gets fined $50k, but I don't know if that's ever been enforced or if anybody in that state has actually openly broken a federal gun law to test it yet.
Same thing they did under Obama, remember fast and furious where no government agents were arrested tried and executed for blatant treason that resulted in the deaths of Americans, Mexicans and French?
Those deals on blemished receivers and package deals on daggers with like 6-10 mags look amazing, they're selling you mags for cheap and practically giving the gun away.
Money from arms manufacturers and interest groups alike go into the pockets of politicians. All three parties see a nice chunk of change come their way whenever some new law or regulation gets proposed. As much posturing as all sides do, firearms will never be banned outright. They're not going to let their bottom line take that much of a hit.
I don't think they would ever have to choose between the two. They already have complete control over the public without having to take their weapons, and can actually continue arming the populace with no risk to themselves. It's not like any meaningful coordination to strike against them would be made. By the time any they would make any actual, concerned effort to outlaw firearms, it will be out of their hands.
So they'll be a ton of illegal guns then? There's WAY too many guns, manufacturers both public businesses and private hobbyist and stores of guns that you have NO WAY of enforcing any kind measure like this.
And judging what happened previously, sheriffs and police departments will tell you to go fuck yourself in trying to enforce it and the ATF are too scared to do it themselves since they'll have no one to hide behind.
The idea appears to be that the Biden administration will de facto revoke the second amendment by removing any and all places where you might purchase a firearm, and doing it using a Federal agency that isn't beholden to any kind of local pressure.
Bear in mind that the same people are also mulling quite how they can ban 80%ers without getting themselves a new orifice torn by the Supreme Court.
In the state of Missouri they passed a law that says any police officer who helps the ATF enforce a federal gun law gets fined $50k, but I don't know if that's ever been enforced or if anybody in that state has actually openly broken a federal gun law to test it yet.
makes me want to buy more.
Same thing they did under Obama, remember fast and furious where no government agents were arrested tried and executed for blatant treason that resulted in the deaths of Americans, Mexicans and French?
PSA is basically giving away Glock clones and AR15s.
And to make sure, buy some slides and uppers so you can print frames/lowers.
The entire mission statement of PSA is to get as many guns into the hands of people as possible as cheaply as possible ahead of future bans.
Those deals on blemished receivers and package deals on daggers with like 6-10 mags look amazing, they're selling you mags for cheap and practically giving the gun away.
treason
Money from arms manufacturers and interest groups alike go into the pockets of politicians. All three parties see a nice chunk of change come their way whenever some new law or regulation gets proposed. As much posturing as all sides do, firearms will never be banned outright. They're not going to let their bottom line take that much of a hit.
I don't think they would ever have to choose between the two. They already have complete control over the public without having to take their weapons, and can actually continue arming the populace with no risk to themselves. It's not like any meaningful coordination to strike against them would be made. By the time any they would make any actual, concerned effort to outlaw firearms, it will be out of their hands.