I don't think they would ever have to choose between the two. They already have complete control over the public without having to take their weapons, and can actually continue arming the populace with no risk to themselves. It's not like any meaningful coordination to strike against them would be made. By the time any they would make any actual, concerned effort to outlaw firearms, it will be out of their hands.
I don't think they would ever have to choose between the two. They already have complete control over the public without having to take their weapons, and can actually continue arming the populace with no risk to themselves. It's not like any meaningful coordination to strike against them would be made. By the time any they would make any actual, concerned effort to outlaw firearms, it will be out of their hands.