The primary goals of women's organizations regarding the internet are :
Create a law banning "virtual violence against women and girls."
UK is here, EU is about to be.
Ban pornography other than sites women control and get the majority of the revenue from.
Women are hard at work at this worldwide, from the UK, to the US to Asia.
Biden('s female handler) recently appointed a woman to the FCC who is known to support OnlyFans.
Hawley backed the bill forcing ID for access to porn sites (not to produce content, which is already mandatory), which will disproportionately affect the sites women don't control.
De-anonymize the Internet to allow the enforcement of future laws against "virtual violence against women and girls"
The UK entered this stage in 2017 when PM May had the MPs whipped to support a bill that forced ISPs to record every site a UK resident goes to, with government having full access to that database.
The EU entered it around Covid times, with pushes against "disinformation".
It looks like Hawley is pushing the US towards it.
Isn't that more of a nanny-state problem in the UK/EU than a feminist one? Although I guess there's probably some correlation between nanny-state and feminist driven agendas. Just not a connection I'd ever heard or thought of before.
This is a fucking retarded move from Hawley.
I told you. The feminist test never fails.
Anyone who wants to follow even one of their ideas, regardless of context, popularity or anything else, is evil.
His tradcon background is the problem.
You are wrong about Hawley being a feminist.
We both can agree that this policy idea is stupid as fuck though.
I'm not wrong.
The primary goals of women's organizations regarding the internet are :
UK is here, EU is about to be.
Women are hard at work at this worldwide, from the UK, to the US to Asia.
Biden('s female handler) recently appointed a woman to the FCC who is known to support OnlyFans.
Hawley backed the bill forcing ID for access to porn sites (not to produce content, which is already mandatory), which will disproportionately affect the sites women don't control.
The UK entered this stage in 2017 when PM May had the MPs whipped to support a bill that forced ISPs to record every site a UK resident goes to, with government having full access to that database.
The EU entered it around Covid times, with pushes against "disinformation".
It looks like Hawley is pushing the US towards it.
Isn't that more of a nanny-state problem in the UK/EU than a feminist one? Although I guess there's probably some correlation between nanny-state and feminist driven agendas. Just not a connection I'd ever heard or thought of before.