It looks like the timing of this was very brief. All JK did was make a legal threat, without enough time to follow through, and the twitter tranny dyke immediately put her skin grafted dick between her legs and ran away.
As a general rule this will not be successful.
The original comment "IS a nazi or at least has views that align with them." is likely not actionable because it was qualified and is a statement of opinion not meant to be taken literally that JK is a card carrying Nazi Party member (who don't exist anyway).
It is extremely difficult for any famous public figure to win a defamation suit.
Doubly so when that public figure "injected themselves" into the controversy as JK has in taking on the trannies.
The UK government/judges will generally side with the trannies.
It only worked this one time because this tranny was uniquely a coward. Most trannies wouldn't back down so easily and you should not interpret this as an enduring victory or a successful tactic.
All your points are valid. However, UK libel laws are a lot more strict than the American ones. So I'm not as sure that this would be a slam dunk for the defendant.
I disagree with 1. Is a nazi is clearly meant to be taken literally and usage of such language has a detrimental effect on her image and reputation because people parrot that shit. Furthermore as a euro she's actually being accused of heinous criminal conduct because nazism is illegal there.
It looks like the timing of this was very brief. All JK did was make a legal threat, without enough time to follow through, and the twitter tranny dyke immediately put her skin grafted dick between her legs and ran away.
As a general rule this will not be successful.
The original comment "IS a nazi or at least has views that align with them." is likely not actionable because it was qualified and is a statement of opinion not meant to be taken literally that JK is a card carrying Nazi Party member (who don't exist anyway).
It is extremely difficult for any famous public figure to win a defamation suit.
Doubly so when that public figure "injected themselves" into the controversy as JK has in taking on the trannies.
Anti-SLAPP laws are a bitch. While no such specific laws exist in the UK right now, their regulators are trying to backdoor them.
The UK government/judges will generally side with the trannies.
It only worked this one time because this tranny was uniquely a coward. Most trannies wouldn't back down so easily and you should not interpret this as an enduring victory or a successful tactic.
That's even better then!
All your points are valid. However, UK libel laws are a lot more strict than the American ones. So I'm not as sure that this would be a slam dunk for the defendant.
I disagree with 1. Is a nazi is clearly meant to be taken literally and usage of such language has a detrimental effect on her image and reputation because people parrot that shit. Furthermore as a euro she's actually being accused of heinous criminal conduct because nazism is illegal there.
in the US, sure. UK defamation laws are obnoxious, and even with such a qualifier, doesn't mean shit.