you can now go to jail in Canada for simply saying you dont believe an event happened
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (102)
sorted by:
Yet another botted post by stormfags.
I was actually going to mention you regarding a broader application of this given your own stance regarding Sarah Everard but by all means whine about made up bots instead of the main issue at hand until it affects you directly.
This law is old enough that Joe Biden would fuck it. Why is it suddenly top of this site?
UK's "misogyny" law makes this look like nothing, by the way. Reading the full report by the European Women's Lobby shows how far they plan to go.
You should either try to come up with something that at least resembles an argument or just stay silent. Go ahead, try arguing that this is what the feminist illuminati that you keep ranting about wants.
What do I need to say? I said it in my other comment. Read the report I linked in my other post about European influence on the UK. It's a clear plan for global censorship of criticism towards women, sponsored by Google and supported by the European Union.
You're worried about not being able to question something that people lived through, they are going to be unable to challenge the wage gap, or they'll be charged with "digital violence against women."
The only value stormfags have is to the enemy as an easy first group to censor due to how universally hated they are. It's so easy to justify censorship when the people you're targeting are the "Jews weren't killed in the camps, but they should have been" types.