It is. Or do you believe little boys who have been groomed should pay 18 years of child support to help their female superior with costs? They talk about the whole "what was she wearing" thing and play victim, but they never talk about the fact that they openly supported "what if the child consents" to get their cut.
Well, that's women's problem. The money is there, go sue for it. With any luck, I'll kill two birds with one stone and start seeing women's organizations folding.
You must feel embarrassed to support your rape victim tax, if all you have is diverison.
It's literally the same thing but with holding male victims responsible. How is it a diversion?
When have women's groups ever claimed that this is wrong and should be overturned? Never.
Regardless, as I said, women's groups can pay it. The actual victim doesn't have to.
They've been doing it to us for 30 years now, but they actually give the bill to the child.
Incorrect.
And if they don't, because they don't care about rape victims? Because they don't.
Lay off the resentment.
It is. Or do you believe little boys who have been groomed should pay 18 years of child support to help their female superior with costs? They talk about the whole "what was she wearing" thing and play victim, but they never talk about the fact that they openly supported "what if the child consents" to get their cut.
Well, that's women's problem. The money is there, go sue for it. With any luck, I'll kill two birds with one stone and start seeing women's organizations folding.
When was that? Can you give three links?
And how does this justify your support for a rape victim fine?