not even getting into the neo-nazi stuff, we are not all equal.
it's trivial to measure obvious differences between races and sub-races. take average height for example. races and sub-races have wildly different stats for average height.
now expand to something less superficial... rates of skin cancer and sickle cell. these are DIRECTLY racially influenced. whites get skin cancer far more and far worse than everyone else as melanin directly inhibits UV damage that causes skin cancer. sickle cell is massively more common in blacks, as it's a natural mutation that aids in surviving malaria, which was common in africa, but not common in most of the rest of the world. blacks with sickle cell survived malaria outbreaks to pass on their genes. those without it didn't.
even crazier, "black" has many sub-races, even more than whites. sickle cell is not universally prevalent among blacks. similarly, running race winners tend to be split across different black sub-races. racial kenyans destroy everyone in long distance running. various pockets of blacks from the islands and pockets of africa dominate short distance running.
these are directly observable and empirically measurable traits that are scientifically incontrovertible. these shouldn't even be controversial. the problem is that once they accept this, then they're forced to accept that there may also be racially different, measurable stats on matters like IQ or criminality.
it's why you get called racist for stating the medically certain fact that whites get skin cancer more and blacks get sickle cell more. because they eventually lost enough arguments that they know what comes next.
right, but the point is that woke jackasses won't even accept the simple scientific facts that are not even controversial. no way they will accept the controversial facts. it's why we need to get more aggressive in mocking them as anti-science fools pushing the cult of wokeness.
not even getting into the neo-nazi stuff, we are not all equal.
it's trivial to measure obvious differences between races and sub-races. take average height for example. races and sub-races have wildly different stats for average height.
now expand to something less superficial... rates of skin cancer and sickle cell. these are DIRECTLY racially influenced. whites get skin cancer far more and far worse than everyone else as melanin directly inhibits UV damage that causes skin cancer. sickle cell is massively more common in blacks, as it's a natural mutation that aids in surviving malaria, which was common in africa, but not common in most of the rest of the world. blacks with sickle cell survived malaria outbreaks to pass on their genes. those without it didn't.
even crazier, "black" has many sub-races, even more than whites. sickle cell is not universally prevalent among blacks. similarly, running race winners tend to be split across different black sub-races. racial kenyans destroy everyone in long distance running. various pockets of blacks from the islands and pockets of africa dominate short distance running.
these are directly observable and empirically measurable traits that are scientifically incontrovertible. these shouldn't even be controversial. the problem is that once they accept this, then they're forced to accept that there may also be racially different, measurable stats on matters like IQ or criminality.
it's why you get called racist for stating the medically certain fact that whites get skin cancer more and blacks get sickle cell more. because they eventually lost enough arguments that they know what comes next.
Also brain size
right, but the point is that woke jackasses won't even accept the simple scientific facts that are not even controversial. no way they will accept the controversial facts. it's why we need to get more aggressive in mocking them as anti-science fools pushing the cult of wokeness.