The question is not whether it leads to real-world violence, but if it can be reasonable read as incitement to violence. As we have established, it most certainly can be.

No, it can’t. That would require an actual representation of violence. Which you magically keep leaping over. Once again, by this argument you would ban anyone in a redcoat for it “inciting violence”. You have no rational standard or metric of objectivity other than “we once fought a war with the British, so anything related to that is magically violence!”

You are too autistic to see something from someone else's perspective. I'm sorry to say.

“Your perspective” is the autistic one here bud, if you don’t believe me make a post about “your perspective” and watch how “your perspective” does