He's trying to frame this attention grab as 'it's bad that this highly successful Youtuber has helped all these people when the government should do it and not paywall it off' because attacking Mr Beast directly for this is EXTREMELY dumb and a suicide for content creator.
Pushing devil's advocate to the extreme, he's partly right that it's bad a 10 minute procedure has been 'paywalled' off but back in reality, all this shit costs money from equipment, years of training, facilities, drugs needed during and after.
Unless you want substandard care, this costs money. If we could have it as a charity write off or in this case using it to create content, that's great because it's sustainable for wealthy individuals to pay for these procedures and be more involved in this kind of charity than giving it to BLM to buy mansions.
Isn't it already a charity write off?
I honestly did not even know it was that expensive, I thought it was a routine procedure especially for old people.
Not a lawyer so don't fully know if the way Mr Beast did it counts or the most he can claim is business expenses.
Do a lot of those old people have insurance as that's a key factor in this, and with charity write offs, I may be wrong so if we have legal experts here then please correct but doesn't it have to go through an organisation registered as a charity than you just paying a doctor or hospital to do all these procedures?
He's trying to frame this attention grab as 'it's bad that this highly successful Youtuber has helped all these people when the government should do it and not paywall it off' because attacking Mr Beast directly for this is EXTREMELY dumb and a suicide for content creator.
Pushing devil's advocate to the extreme, he's partly right that it's bad a 10 minute procedure has been 'paywalled' off but back in reality, all this shit costs money from equipment, years of training, facilities, drugs needed during and after.
Unless you want substandard care, this costs money. If we could have it as a charity write off or in this case using it to create content, that's great because it's sustainable for wealthy individuals to pay for these procedures and be more involved in this kind of charity than giving it to BLM to buy mansions.
Isn't it already a charity write off? I honestly did not even know it was that expensive, I thought it was a routine procedure especially for old people.
Not a lawyer so don't fully know if the way Mr Beast did it counts or the most he can claim is business expenses.
Do a lot of those old people have insurance as that's a key factor in this, and with charity write offs, I may be wrong so if we have legal experts here then please correct but doesn't it have to go through an organisation registered as a charity than you just paying a doctor or hospital to do all these procedures?