With everyone who ever spoke against women being doxxed and put on a secret HR blacklist shared between all the major corporations under penalty of higher interest rates from the feminist-allied banks for hiring any of them?
Of all the female domination practices, findem is by far the absolute worst. I have more respect for the men that wear diapers and suck on a soother while a dominatrix treats them like a baby than I do for men into findem.
I feel like findem is just the fetishized version of simping and I blame simps as much as women. You can either be on men's side or women's side and simps chose their side. A healthy society would ensure the simps were annihilated as readily as disobedient women.
You think simps are a new development? How do you figure women gained their power in the first place when they had no power to begin with? There was no gynocratic system brainwashing the men to simp for women from the beginning of time. You can argue that maybe such a system existed in the 1800s or maybe even earlier but such a system didn't exist always and yet here we are.
You seem to think if we fixed the system once the it would be for all but that would not be the case. Simping is a natural phenomenon in men. Weak Men, men with certain genetic predispositions toward simping, met with certain ever changing environmental pressures end up simping. One needs to be ever vigilant against simps. If ever we had an opportunity to right the wrongs in this world, the simps would stand in the way and they must be killed. The allies killed the unranking members of the Nazis when they were at war. We are at war right now until the Patriarhcal Imperium is reestablished and all simps until then are our enemies who would stand in our way and they should be eliminated. No quarter for the men that promote the gynocracy.
How do you figure women gained their power in the first place when they had no power to begin with?
Unironically, racism. The whole argument for the 19th Amendment was that it would "snow under" the votes of freed black men.
It's why I laugh at the race grifting trash on both sides. The leftists just want men divided and the far-right just want to protect their precious white women from mean words.
You seem to think if we fixed the system once that it would be for all but that would not be the case.
Of course not. Every time we fix it, feminist women will conjure up a new way to gain power, a new enemy that we all must unite against.
But maybe, if we fix it in the age of technology, it might stick for longer. It'll be forever on the Internet, and people will always be able to refer back to it. We must simply ensure that key institutions are insulated from corruption so they can't rewrite it.
We are at war right now until the Patriarhcal Imperium is reestablished
It's not that simple. And re-establishing a traditional patriarchy should not be the goal, it does not fit with what we know about modern women. We need a new system that acknowledges everything we've learned, not one from 2000 years ago.
I like this idea of reestablishing something better.
I disagree with your idea that racism is what caused the rise to power of women. It was the complete opposite. It's once we stopped being racist, women were allowed to gain power. Racism is an acceptance of natural hierarchies and equality is the denial. Female power can only exist in a society that denies natural hierarchies. The more racist your society, the less easily women will be able to gain power, IMO.
Anyway, maybe you should make a topic on your anti-feminist forum and link it or something but what would your ideal "something new" look-like. I know we're going to disagree because I want to enslave women and you've got morals and all that but I would be curious. See, I still value women as sexual objects so I wonder if a man like me would still be able to attain what I value in your ideal society.
OF people are different - they crave the personal touch. It's the parasocial relationship that they come for.
To understand why this is a big deal, you have to understand that OF is not really porn. I've said this a few times and people still think it's a weird comment.
I'm going to try my best to explain it with a simple dichotomy. This might become a c/feminism post one day.
Parasociality vs Sexuality.
OnlyFans is heavily built on parasociality, in the same way as Twitch or YouTube communities are. Parasocial relationships are not something exclusive to OF, even male YouTube stars use a form of it, pushing a soft friendship that builds loyalty to the content creator.
A non-sexual example of a parasocial relationship is when YouTube stars directly address their audiences. It feels personal, but in reality, it isn't. They don't know who you are and they likely don't care. Another is when game company CEOs try to build hype around a game, talking about how they worked hard on it just for you, pushing a slight parasociality.
There are even examples of unintended parasociality where people build affinity with a character in a show or cartoon.
These examples of parasociality don't really do any harm. Sure, you're emotionally invested in people who don't care, but outside of some shit merchandise or overhyped game, you're not losing much in terms of actual value. Even for the people obsessed with an anime girl, their damage is largely reputational, not financial.
Sexuality doesn't really need much explaining. You get horny, you seek sexual content or intercourse and that's sexuality. This is how the porn industry works. You are bombarded with ads, and that's how they make their money. Some offer Netflix-style subscriptions, but even these cap your spending at a fairly low amount.
OnlyFans combines the impulse of sexuality with the faux cameraderie of parasociality. That's what makes it such a gold mine. They hook into your sexual impulse and the parasociality keeps you loyal, as the woman slowly but surely "radicalizes" you, like a cult leader or Islamic terrorist group would, to devote yourself to her. When you combine this with the fragile mental state of young men thanks to the feminist led school system, it's a very powerful attack.
A whistleblower on the industry claimed that huge offices of desperate Venezuelans were being offered $6 an hour with a target of $1000 of extractions per victim, with pre-taken images and videos to send as these workers built the parasocial relationship for the women.
Only through education about parasociality and the removal of women's influence on young men can we prevent this getting worse.
It's parasocial porn. Parasocial relationships aren't anything new. They've been enabled and transformed through communications technology for centuries. Those "Dear Whoever" newspaper columnists that would respond to letters from their readers are parasocial. Phone sex lines are parasocial. Psychic hotline bullshit is parasocial.
So fucking what? You aren't concerned about any of this shit outside of the hate boner you reserved for OF. You couldn't care less about combating degeneracy more generally and are pro porn aside from OF. You couldn't care less about combating predatory and exploitative business models, parasocial or otherwise, more generally either. You're just a boring liberal with the veneer of a radical because you've plugged unusual variables into the formula.
I want your organs for great leaders
breakfastillness.With everyone who ever spoke against women being doxxed and put on a secret HR blacklist shared between all the major corporations under penalty of higher interest rates from the feminist-allied banks for hiring any of them?
Of all the female domination practices, findem is by far the absolute worst. I have more respect for the men that wear diapers and suck on a soother while a dominatrix treats them like a baby than I do for men into findem.
I don't feel it's fair to kick them while they're down. If they were mentally stable, they wouldn't be into findom.
It's another one of those things that women with power must be held accountable for.
I feel like findem is just the fetishized version of simping and I blame simps as much as women. You can either be on men's side or women's side and simps chose their side. A healthy society would ensure the simps were annihilated as readily as disobedient women.
I feel like you can't blame them. They're brainwashed beyond belief, broken from before they could walk by the female elite.
They know no better. They've been taught women are their superiors before they could understand what that meant.
Why do you think the Allies never prosecuted the non-ranking members of the Nazi Party or the Hitler Youth?
You think simps are a new development? How do you figure women gained their power in the first place when they had no power to begin with? There was no gynocratic system brainwashing the men to simp for women from the beginning of time. You can argue that maybe such a system existed in the 1800s or maybe even earlier but such a system didn't exist always and yet here we are.
You seem to think if we fixed the system once the it would be for all but that would not be the case. Simping is a natural phenomenon in men. Weak Men, men with certain genetic predispositions toward simping, met with certain ever changing environmental pressures end up simping. One needs to be ever vigilant against simps. If ever we had an opportunity to right the wrongs in this world, the simps would stand in the way and they must be killed. The allies killed the unranking members of the Nazis when they were at war. We are at war right now until the Patriarhcal Imperium is reestablished and all simps until then are our enemies who would stand in our way and they should be eliminated. No quarter for the men that promote the gynocracy.
Unironically, racism. The whole argument for the 19th Amendment was that it would "snow under" the votes of freed black men.
It's why I laugh at the race grifting trash on both sides. The leftists just want men divided and the far-right just want to protect their precious white women from mean words.
Of course not. Every time we fix it, feminist women will conjure up a new way to gain power, a new enemy that we all must unite against.
But maybe, if we fix it in the age of technology, it might stick for longer. It'll be forever on the Internet, and people will always be able to refer back to it. We must simply ensure that key institutions are insulated from corruption so they can't rewrite it.
It's not that simple. And re-establishing a traditional patriarchy should not be the goal, it does not fit with what we know about modern women. We need a new system that acknowledges everything we've learned, not one from 2000 years ago.
I like this idea of reestablishing something better.
I disagree with your idea that racism is what caused the rise to power of women. It was the complete opposite. It's once we stopped being racist, women were allowed to gain power. Racism is an acceptance of natural hierarchies and equality is the denial. Female power can only exist in a society that denies natural hierarchies. The more racist your society, the less easily women will be able to gain power, IMO.
Anyway, maybe you should make a topic on your anti-feminist forum and link it or something but what would your ideal "something new" look-like. I know we're going to disagree because I want to enslave women and you've got morals and all that but I would be curious. See, I still value women as sexual objects so I wonder if a man like me would still be able to attain what I value in your ideal society.
???????
When I asked you why that law wouldn't apply to OF, you said it was because they already ask for a credit card.
That's what I'm saying. The ID law will cripple the opposition just as the FCC Dem majority backs OF.
Credit cards requirements (assuming you're even correct about OF requiring them) haven't crippled OF though.
OF people are different - they crave the personal touch. It's the parasocial relationship that they come for.
To understand why this is a big deal, you have to understand that OF is not really porn. I've said this a few times and people still think it's a weird comment.
I'm going to try my best to explain it with a simple dichotomy. This might become a c/feminism post one day.
Parasociality vs Sexuality.
OnlyFans is heavily built on parasociality, in the same way as Twitch or YouTube communities are. Parasocial relationships are not something exclusive to OF, even male YouTube stars use a form of it, pushing a soft friendship that builds loyalty to the content creator.
A non-sexual example of a parasocial relationship is when YouTube stars directly address their audiences. It feels personal, but in reality, it isn't. They don't know who you are and they likely don't care. Another is when game company CEOs try to build hype around a game, talking about how they worked hard on it just for you, pushing a slight parasociality. There are even examples of unintended parasociality where people build affinity with a character in a show or cartoon.
These examples of parasociality don't really do any harm. Sure, you're emotionally invested in people who don't care, but outside of some shit merchandise or overhyped game, you're not losing much in terms of actual value. Even for the people obsessed with an anime girl, their damage is largely reputational, not financial.
Sexuality doesn't really need much explaining. You get horny, you seek sexual content or intercourse and that's sexuality. This is how the porn industry works. You are bombarded with ads, and that's how they make their money. Some offer Netflix-style subscriptions, but even these cap your spending at a fairly low amount.
OnlyFans combines the impulse of sexuality with the faux cameraderie of parasociality. That's what makes it such a gold mine. They hook into your sexual impulse and the parasociality keeps you loyal, as the woman slowly but surely "radicalizes" you, like a cult leader or Islamic terrorist group would, to devote yourself to her. When you combine this with the fragile mental state of young men thanks to the feminist led school system, it's a very powerful attack.
A whistleblower on the industry claimed that huge offices of desperate Venezuelans were being offered $6 an hour with a target of $1000 of extractions per victim, with pre-taken images and videos to send as these workers built the parasocial relationship for the women.
Only through education about parasociality and the removal of women's influence on young men can we prevent this getting worse.
It's parasocial porn. Parasocial relationships aren't anything new. They've been enabled and transformed through communications technology for centuries. Those "Dear Whoever" newspaper columnists that would respond to letters from their readers are parasocial. Phone sex lines are parasocial. Psychic hotline bullshit is parasocial.
So fucking what? You aren't concerned about any of this shit outside of the hate boner you reserved for OF. You couldn't care less about combating degeneracy more generally and are pro porn aside from OF. You couldn't care less about combating predatory and exploitative business models, parasocial or otherwise, more generally either. You're just a boring liberal with the veneer of a radical because you've plugged unusual variables into the formula.
Because I correctly identify that as a contribution to women's cause.
I just want their racket shut down, I don't want to build back their shitty alliance with the tradcucks from the 80s.
Last time you tried to fight degeneracy, we ended up with no-fault divorce and endless alimony settlements.
Archive Link
Fuck. I made a typo.
It all ties together.
One Party under the More Feminine Way.