You think simps are a new development? How do you figure women gained their power in the first place when they had no power to begin with? There was no gynocratic system brainwashing the men to simp for women from the beginning of time. You can argue that maybe such a system existed in the 1800s or maybe even earlier but such a system didn't exist always and yet here we are.
You seem to think if we fixed the system once the it would be for all but that would not be the case. Simping is a natural phenomenon in men. Weak Men, men with certain genetic predispositions toward simping, met with certain ever changing environmental pressures end up simping. One needs to be ever vigilant against simps. If ever we had an opportunity to right the wrongs in this world, the simps would stand in the way and they must be killed. The allies killed the unranking members of the Nazis when they were at war. We are at war right now until the Patriarhcal Imperium is reestablished and all simps until then are our enemies who would stand in our way and they should be eliminated. No quarter for the men that promote the gynocracy.
How do you figure women gained their power in the first place when they had no power to begin with?
Unironically, racism. The whole argument for the 19th Amendment was that it would "snow under" the votes of freed black men.
It's why I laugh at the race grifting trash on both sides. The leftists just want men divided and the far-right just want to protect their precious white women from mean words.
You seem to think if we fixed the system once that it would be for all but that would not be the case.
Of course not. Every time we fix it, feminist women will conjure up a new way to gain power, a new enemy that we all must unite against.
But maybe, if we fix it in the age of technology, it might stick for longer. It'll be forever on the Internet, and people will always be able to refer back to it. We must simply ensure that key institutions are insulated from corruption so they can't rewrite it.
We are at war right now until the Patriarhcal Imperium is reestablished
It's not that simple. And re-establishing a traditional patriarchy should not be the goal, it does not fit with what we know about modern women. We need a new system that acknowledges everything we've learned, not one from 2000 years ago.
I like this idea of reestablishing something better.
I disagree with your idea that racism is what caused the rise to power of women. It was the complete opposite. It's once we stopped being racist, women were allowed to gain power. Racism is an acceptance of natural hierarchies and equality is the denial. Female power can only exist in a society that denies natural hierarchies. The more racist your society, the less easily women will be able to gain power, IMO.
Anyway, maybe you should make a topic on your anti-feminist forum and link it or something but what would your ideal "something new" look-like. I know we're going to disagree because I want to enslave women and you've got morals and all that but I would be curious. See, I still value women as sexual objects so I wonder if a man like me would still be able to attain what I value in your ideal society.
You think simps are a new development? How do you figure women gained their power in the first place when they had no power to begin with? There was no gynocratic system brainwashing the men to simp for women from the beginning of time. You can argue that maybe such a system existed in the 1800s or maybe even earlier but such a system didn't exist always and yet here we are.
You seem to think if we fixed the system once the it would be for all but that would not be the case. Simping is a natural phenomenon in men. Weak Men, men with certain genetic predispositions toward simping, met with certain ever changing environmental pressures end up simping. One needs to be ever vigilant against simps. If ever we had an opportunity to right the wrongs in this world, the simps would stand in the way and they must be killed. The allies killed the unranking members of the Nazis when they were at war. We are at war right now until the Patriarhcal Imperium is reestablished and all simps until then are our enemies who would stand in our way and they should be eliminated. No quarter for the men that promote the gynocracy.
Unironically, racism. The whole argument for the 19th Amendment was that it would "snow under" the votes of freed black men.
It's why I laugh at the race grifting trash on both sides. The leftists just want men divided and the far-right just want to protect their precious white women from mean words.
Of course not. Every time we fix it, feminist women will conjure up a new way to gain power, a new enemy that we all must unite against.
But maybe, if we fix it in the age of technology, it might stick for longer. It'll be forever on the Internet, and people will always be able to refer back to it. We must simply ensure that key institutions are insulated from corruption so they can't rewrite it.
It's not that simple. And re-establishing a traditional patriarchy should not be the goal, it does not fit with what we know about modern women. We need a new system that acknowledges everything we've learned, not one from 2000 years ago.
I like this idea of reestablishing something better.
I disagree with your idea that racism is what caused the rise to power of women. It was the complete opposite. It's once we stopped being racist, women were allowed to gain power. Racism is an acceptance of natural hierarchies and equality is the denial. Female power can only exist in a society that denies natural hierarchies. The more racist your society, the less easily women will be able to gain power, IMO.
Anyway, maybe you should make a topic on your anti-feminist forum and link it or something but what would your ideal "something new" look-like. I know we're going to disagree because I want to enslave women and you've got morals and all that but I would be curious. See, I still value women as sexual objects so I wonder if a man like me would still be able to attain what I value in your ideal society.