By definition if you are fleeing your war torn country and claim asylum you should be rejected if you pass up multiple countries. By definition those coming to Europe are economic opportunists. I get wanting a better life but the western world can’t take in everybody who wants a better life
I would like to know who dictated that asylum must be a thing.
I would argue, at the very least, that a country with a massive immigration problem ought to be exempt.
Especially if there are countries that are willing to take these people. I don't see why they should be allowed to force their way into any other country.
By definition if you are fleeing your war torn country and claim asylum you should be rejected if you pass up multiple countries. By definition those coming to Europe are economic opportunists. I get wanting a better life but the western world can’t take in everybody who wants a better life
First port of safe harbor. It's an actual thing. But all the leftist governments ignore it.
Some years ago I worked for immigration and that was the rule and as far as I know it hasn’t changed
I would like to know who dictated that asylum must be a thing.
I would argue, at the very least, that a country with a massive immigration problem ought to be exempt.
Especially if there are countries that are willing to take these people. I don't see why they should be allowed to force their way into any other country.
I think it was a UN thing. But you make a good point