First, the fact of no data with an experimental treatment is all the info I need to decide not to get it.
Second, there was tons of population level data that clearly showed death rates weren't generally up. There was data to show that cases and deaths were actively being over-counted. There was data that showed who was getting sick in terms of age and risk factors (cough retirement homes cough). There were studies showing effective alternative treatments. There was a ton of data throwing the official narrative into question, if not complete falsehood.
I would love to see Adams ask a "skeptic" to send him the data they used to make their decision (I've got about 100 bookmarked pages and files) rather than just chaulk it up to luck.
Yeah, I don't get his "there was no data" spiel.
First, the fact of no data with an experimental treatment is all the info I need to decide not to get it.
Second, there was tons of population level data that clearly showed death rates weren't generally up. There was data to show that cases and deaths were actively being over-counted. There was data that showed who was getting sick in terms of age and risk factors (cough retirement homes cough). There were studies showing effective alternative treatments. There was a ton of data throwing the official narrative into question, if not complete falsehood.
I would love to see Adams ask a "skeptic" to send him the data they used to make their decision (I've got about 100 bookmarked pages and files) rather than just chaulk it up to luck.