You're wrong about that, and you should actually talk to people who lived in the 60's as an adult, rather than watching clips from Left-wing media and Hollywood from the time period.
Racism in the 1960's was fairly normal, for every group. Not just inter-race racism, but what could be described as intra-race racism. There are plenty of Eastern European communities around where I live, and one thing they've noticed is that Slavic ethnic hatred, and Orthodox religious hatred basically fell off a cliff after the 90's. Poland and Ukraine have never been as popular in American history as they are today.
Most people were more like the nice side of Archie Bunker. What I would call "non-threateningly bigoted". Every once in a while you get some off-handed comment about jews and blacks, but most of the time they didn't know any jews or blacks, and "being a credit to your race" was actually a compliment that people would accept.
The large minority were racialists who were more like that bigoted side of Archie Bunker, which wasn't even that bad: They don't like Klansmen, they fucking hate Nazis, they don't want their daughters or sons to marry outside of their race, but also don't have a problem working with other races or ethnic groups, but also think that different groups just can't be in parts of society, or do things in certain society. They wouldn't ever resort to ethnic violence or intimidation, but they also had racialist ideas about society.
What you don't realize is that the Progressives of the turn of the century were hard-core racialists, and had only pulled back from that post-World War 2. The 1960's was when the Progressives were talking to themselves, convincing themselves that the racist shit they'd been doing for the previous century and a half was actually "uncooth" and "not modern".
What the Progressives have now done is returned to their old habits, because the Black National Socialists among them never really changed since W.E.B. DuBouis coined the term "Black Folk" in reference to the German Volkish Movement. Socialists have always known that they can use Progressive Nationalism to wear Nationalism as a skin-suit to push Leftism in a society, just as they did from 1850-1940 in Europe. They still did Progressive Nationalism elsewhere after WW2, and it also caused major wars in those places too.
But, again, Progressives have never represented the majority of any society, just some (or many) of the elites and institutions.
Americans are significantly less racist now than they were in the 1960's. Progressives are just more racist than they've ever been since the 1920's.
The Trotskyites successfully infiltrated the governments of the US and UK, where in other countries they were brutally slaughtered by Stalinist and Maoist types.
It's the Old Left v. New Left distinction. Lennin never could stand Fabianism, and Trotsky probably would have have gone on a similar killing spree if it hadn't have threatened his funding from the West.
I don't agree with your assessment that all races only hate one race, just that the hatred against one race is now institutionally protected, and more importantly: that doesn't make anything less or more racist.
and all the institutions of messaging (propaganda producers) all targeting one single race and dehumanizing them is more akin to nazi germany.
Other institutions were promoting race hatred. The Jim Crow South was it's own institution. It just wasn't one of the institutions that survived to annoy Americans to this day.
You're wrong about that, and you should actually talk to people who lived in the 60's as an adult, rather than watching clips from Left-wing media and Hollywood from the time period.
Racism in the 1960's was fairly normal, for every group. Not just inter-race racism, but what could be described as intra-race racism. There are plenty of Eastern European communities around where I live, and one thing they've noticed is that Slavic ethnic hatred, and Orthodox religious hatred basically fell off a cliff after the 90's. Poland and Ukraine have never been as popular in American history as they are today.
Most people were more like the nice side of Archie Bunker. What I would call "non-threateningly bigoted". Every once in a while you get some off-handed comment about jews and blacks, but most of the time they didn't know any jews or blacks, and "being a credit to your race" was actually a compliment that people would accept.
The large minority were racialists who were more like that bigoted side of Archie Bunker, which wasn't even that bad: They don't like Klansmen, they fucking hate Nazis, they don't want their daughters or sons to marry outside of their race, but also don't have a problem working with other races or ethnic groups, but also think that different groups just can't be in parts of society, or do things in certain society. They wouldn't ever resort to ethnic violence or intimidation, but they also had racialist ideas about society.
What you don't realize is that the Progressives of the turn of the century were hard-core racialists, and had only pulled back from that post-World War 2. The 1960's was when the Progressives were talking to themselves, convincing themselves that the racist shit they'd been doing for the previous century and a half was actually "uncooth" and "not modern".
What the Progressives have now done is returned to their old habits, because the Black National Socialists among them never really changed since W.E.B. DuBouis coined the term "Black Folk" in reference to the German Volkish Movement. Socialists have always known that they can use Progressive Nationalism to wear Nationalism as a skin-suit to push Leftism in a society, just as they did from 1850-1940 in Europe. They still did Progressive Nationalism elsewhere after WW2, and it also caused major wars in those places too.
But, again, Progressives have never represented the majority of any society, just some (or many) of the elites and institutions.
Americans are significantly less racist now than they were in the 1960's. Progressives are just more racist than they've ever been since the 1920's.
The Trotskyites successfully infiltrated the governments of the US and UK, where in other countries they were brutally slaughtered by Stalinist and Maoist types.
Infiltrated, subverted, and seized.
It's the Old Left v. New Left distinction. Lennin never could stand Fabianism, and Trotsky probably would have have gone on a similar killing spree if it hadn't have threatened his funding from the West.
I don't agree with your assessment that all races only hate one race, just that the hatred against one race is now institutionally protected, and more importantly: that doesn't make anything less or more racist.
Other institutions were promoting race hatred. The Jim Crow South was it's own institution. It just wasn't one of the institutions that survived to annoy Americans to this day.