Well they're charged with negligent manslaughter, contrary to imp's murder delerium, so being incredibly useless is pretty much their defining feature.
I suspect women will murder more children, as has been the case since the 90s.
Men in gangs killing each other will pump up the murder rate as always. ONS refuses to report statistics of violent crimes excluding gang violence and alleged but unproven domestic violence, likely because these statistics would show women to be the majority of violent criminals.
I suspect women will murder more children, as has been the case since the 90s.
Shockingly, people tend to murder those in their proximity.
But you've never been good with statistics. You claimed that women are the "first to be hired, last to be fired"... and then you posted statistics that showed the contrary. Then you claimed that female CEOs would fire 99% men. Has that happened yet?
ONS refuses to report statistics of violent crimes excluding gang violence and alleged but unproven domestic violence
Expound on this a bit. It's not a violent crime if domestic violence is alleged?
likely because these statistics would show women to be the majority of violent criminals.
ONS refuses to report statistics of violent crimes committed while wearing a Richard Nixon mask, probably because this would show that male feminists commit 99% of violent crimes.
TI1 trying to angle that women commit the most violent crimes is pretty laughable. Men committing more should be expected, just like we expect Lions to commit more violent attacks on their prey than we expect Zebras. Men have a distinct advantage over women in the use of violence so men engage in it more. It's also why of all the murders women commit, murdering children may in fact be higher on the list because children are one thing women do have a physical advantage over.
Sometimes TI1's blind rage against women really does make him blind. It reminds me of the guys who hate Jews that always need to show how every bad thing in the world is committed by a Jew that they start calling obvious non-Jews, Jewish to prove their point. Jews can still rule the world without every single bad thing being committed by Jews. Women can still be evil without the majority of violent crime being committed by women.
Take TI1's issue with domestic violence. The better question to me isn't whether the man committed the violence or not, it's whether the woman deserved it or not. Often times in domestic violence cases, the woman 100% deserved to have violence committed on her. The idea that all violence committed is unjustified is false. Gang violence for example is violence we see as justified between those two parties, which is often why we don't really care about it. We know the men who are engaged in these activities often bring the violence on themselves. A lot of women in domestic disputes bring the violence on themselves, so we shouldn't care if men commit violent crimes on women where the woman deserves it. Women often commit crimes on men where the man doesn't deserve it at all, such as killing a child. When comparing violence between the sexes, I think there is a very unfair comparison regarding the types of violence. We make the distinction between say cold blooded murder and warm blooded because we presume warm blooded means there's sensible motives, even if we disagree with them. Cold blooded seem far more heinous. I would propose that if we compared the violence women are involved in compared to men on a whole, women actually commit far more heinous violent crimes than men overall even if men commit more violent crimes.
Six of them to take down one little boy? That's some gross inefficiency, there.
Well they're charged with negligent manslaughter, contrary to imp's murder delerium, so being incredibly useless is pretty much their defining feature.
It's the UK, expecting them to get charged with murder would be wishful thinking even if it is.
Any guesses on whether men or women will commit more murders this year in the UK, Impy?
I suspect women will murder more children, as has been the case since the 90s.
Men in gangs killing each other will pump up the murder rate as always. ONS refuses to report statistics of violent crimes excluding gang violence and alleged but unproven domestic violence, likely because these statistics would show women to be the majority of violent criminals.
Shockingly, people tend to murder those in their proximity.
But you've never been good with statistics. You claimed that women are the "first to be hired, last to be fired"... and then you posted statistics that showed the contrary. Then you claimed that female CEOs would fire 99% men. Has that happened yet?
Expound on this a bit. It's not a violent crime if domestic violence is alleged?
ONS refuses to report statistics of violent crimes committed while wearing a Richard Nixon mask, probably because this would show that male feminists commit 99% of violent crimes.
TI1 trying to angle that women commit the most violent crimes is pretty laughable. Men committing more should be expected, just like we expect Lions to commit more violent attacks on their prey than we expect Zebras. Men have a distinct advantage over women in the use of violence so men engage in it more. It's also why of all the murders women commit, murdering children may in fact be higher on the list because children are one thing women do have a physical advantage over.
Sometimes TI1's blind rage against women really does make him blind. It reminds me of the guys who hate Jews that always need to show how every bad thing in the world is committed by a Jew that they start calling obvious non-Jews, Jewish to prove their point. Jews can still rule the world without every single bad thing being committed by Jews. Women can still be evil without the majority of violent crime being committed by women.
Take TI1's issue with domestic violence. The better question to me isn't whether the man committed the violence or not, it's whether the woman deserved it or not. Often times in domestic violence cases, the woman 100% deserved to have violence committed on her. The idea that all violence committed is unjustified is false. Gang violence for example is violence we see as justified between those two parties, which is often why we don't really care about it. We know the men who are engaged in these activities often bring the violence on themselves. A lot of women in domestic disputes bring the violence on themselves, so we shouldn't care if men commit violent crimes on women where the woman deserves it. Women often commit crimes on men where the man doesn't deserve it at all, such as killing a child. When comparing violence between the sexes, I think there is a very unfair comparison regarding the types of violence. We make the distinction between say cold blooded murder and warm blooded because we presume warm blooded means there's sensible motives, even if we disagree with them. Cold blooded seem far more heinous. I would propose that if we compared the violence women are involved in compared to men on a whole, women actually commit far more heinous violent crimes than men overall even if men commit more violent crimes.