Even his rise to being publicly known felt very fake. He went from nobody to suddenly this massive figure that every young boy in West was obsessed with already.
Reeks of a manufactured controversy/psyop, it reminds me of the whole Jack Murphy dealio not too long ago actually. Kiwifarms was documenting his hilarious meltdown & chain of self-owns while then-non-Elon-owned Twitter was gloating about how great it was that a supposed 'masculinity expert' I had never heard of turned out to be an enthusiastic cuck & pegging fetishist. Struck me as a bit of e-drama (which is gay by default) which got blown way out of proportion.
Similarly I'm completely unfamiliar with this Andrew Tate and why he's supposed to speak for me or why I'm supposed to care about him at all, although I did read like five minutes ago that he supposedly converted to Islam so him being arrested in Romania is chuckle-worthy. Vlad the Impaler must be having a laugh upstairs right about now.
Murphy was at least small time enough to be kinda believable. Like his following was tiny relatively, with seemingly only maybe a thousand across the nation who were all using it as networking. One of the guys who attended posted on the farms during the blowup and, if memory serves, he talked about how little Murphy was even factored in beyond the setup.
Compared to Tate who was supposedly so massive that teachers were having to fight with students who all worshiped him because his influence had permeated their entire worldview. Which much more reeks of manufactured, especially with the whole Greta and pizzabox thing which feel far too "perfectly dramatic" and right into their worldview for this kind of story.
Now I'm starting to wonder why the US fought the Taliban. Did they know too much?
Andrew Tate is the MRA equivalent of a shock jock. That's probably the best way to describe him.
Honestly, until the regime went after him, I thought he was a grifter.
He still probably is. They’ve just very oddly decided to “make an example of him”, it seems…
Seems very “inorganic”, all the coverage, social media, etc…
Much like when Greta first “blew up”…
I’ve been around the sort of activist “scene” enough to know those things don’t really happen organically. All very suss. All of it.
Even his rise to being publicly known felt very fake. He went from nobody to suddenly this massive figure that every young boy in West was obsessed with already.
Reeks of a manufactured controversy/psyop, it reminds me of the whole Jack Murphy dealio not too long ago actually. Kiwifarms was documenting his hilarious meltdown & chain of self-owns while then-non-Elon-owned Twitter was gloating about how great it was that a supposed 'masculinity expert' I had never heard of turned out to be an enthusiastic cuck & pegging fetishist. Struck me as a bit of e-drama (which is gay by default) which got blown way out of proportion.
Similarly I'm completely unfamiliar with this Andrew Tate and why he's supposed to speak for me or why I'm supposed to care about him at all, although I did read like five minutes ago that he supposedly converted to Islam so him being arrested in Romania is chuckle-worthy. Vlad the Impaler must be having a laugh upstairs right about now.
Murphy was at least small time enough to be kinda believable. Like his following was tiny relatively, with seemingly only maybe a thousand across the nation who were all using it as networking. One of the guys who attended posted on the farms during the blowup and, if memory serves, he talked about how little Murphy was even factored in beyond the setup.
Compared to Tate who was supposedly so massive that teachers were having to fight with students who all worshiped him because his influence had permeated their entire worldview. Which much more reeks of manufactured, especially with the whole Greta and pizzabox thing which feel far too "perfectly dramatic" and right into their worldview for this kind of story.