I'm getting in early so I can win 'Transphobe of the year 2023'
Joking aside, we've seen in the past decades, although I'd argue a century at least, how women's roles have changed in WESTERN society. The result, increased depression and stress rates, lower birth rates, more people maiming themselves to 'turn into a woman' and truly evil amounts of abortions each year.
And part of the problem is shifting the concept of femininity, if you ask the feminists you seem to get a response of being a man-whore (acting with behaviours associated with men along with free to sleep around with no attachments), the left say it can be applied to anyone that identifies as female (which is why they try to shift goal posts to include men with femininity) and the right at least focuses on being a competent mother first.
We can all see how this has translated in our media, we went from supporting wives and girlfriends caring for the kids while helping their man overcoming their enemies to women being invincible warriors and all men are dumb so why be tied down to one.
I think a lot of this push to change what femininity means comes from a fundamental aspect of it, it has an element of submission to it. Not in a full 'Handmaid's tale' that feminists like to jerk off to, but there seems to an element of willingly placing yourself behind a man and supporting him in life, something that is consitently mocked and belittled in western media and social media now.
It's one aspect of why western media is dying because of what they portray isn't femininity but men in female skinsuits. I'll stop it here so it doesn't become an essay but I do think the rejection of femininity is one aspect of our current societal collapse.
So because it was all intuitive not like a written down guide, when there was a push to change the roles and the removal of role models to copy from, it fucked both men and women over.
While I think your response is part of the answer, I'd add that I think technological advantage the west had did also enable this. Not saying technology is bad but like everything, you lean on something to hard, it becomes a crutch and technology has enabled an environment where these changes aren't met with immediate repercussions.
Technology is best understood as "Capitalization", or turning your own short term productivity into an asset that increases your long-term productivity.
In effect, the West's use of institutionalization and the reliance on tradition without a formalized knowledge is what allows this to happen. Cultural institutions like religion are a technology. They disseminate a behavior over time so that you don't need to re-learn why you did something. But if you don't know why you're doing a thing, and no one else does either, because the thing was not turned into a formal knowledge, then it becomes easy to attack and alter.
Now, some specific technologies did contribute to this, but I would put most of those down to the Sexual Revolution. They are less of a factor than Leftism's attack on institutions that were not well grounded in a formal knowledge framework.