The only mass shooter that's going to impede is an impatient one. Given that most mass shooters plan months if not a year or more in advance, there's no way this is going to do anything.
Furthermore, very few mass shooters actually use that many bullets. It easy to piss through 500 rounds at the range, but once the mass shooting event starts, targets start running away, and those that don't almost universally require no more than 3 shots before they're no longer moving.
And so there we have the real thing this impedes; Time at the range.
That's what they want reduce. Taking your guns away has hit a dead end, so its time to take away your ability to practice shooting.
I don't think leftists realize that magazines are heavier than they look. Real life isn't some video game where you can carry 500 rounds piss easy wearing some jeans.
Not only is it volume-wise an issue, they also weigh a fair amount when you tack on spare magazines to put the bullets into, all the webbing to mount pouches and such.
That sounds like what the air force and coast guard have. The shells have registry numbers and even barcodes. So if you are issued 12 bullets, they know which ones, and how many you actually used.
This is why you go to train with the army or marines. You keep your issues bullets in a bag, and use the less regulated ones. The only barcodes are the ones you make with brrt.
So they want to restrict ammo.
The only mass shooter that's going to impede is an impatient one. Given that most mass shooters plan months if not a year or more in advance, there's no way this is going to do anything.
Furthermore, very few mass shooters actually use that many bullets. It easy to piss through 500 rounds at the range, but once the mass shooting event starts, targets start running away, and those that don't almost universally require no more than 3 shots before they're no longer moving.
And so there we have the real thing this impedes; Time at the range.
That's what they want reduce. Taking your guns away has hit a dead end, so its time to take away your ability to practice shooting.
I don't think leftists realize that magazines are heavier than they look. Real life isn't some video game where you can carry 500 rounds piss easy wearing some jeans.
Not only is it volume-wise an issue, they also weigh a fair amount when you tack on spare magazines to put the bullets into, all the webbing to mount pouches and such.
What are you going to do, individually serialize the bullets? No, that won't work. You might be able to serialize the casings.
The idea is to make it so tricky to comply with that companies stop making bullets.
Impractical, unconstitutional, and hopefully people burn the whole thing down first, but there you go.
I did not know that microstamping was a thing.
As opposed to low-profile shootings in the inner cities which no one cares about.
You'll take my "BUBBA'S PISSIN' HOT LOADS" from my cold hand!
That sounds like what the air force and coast guard have. The shells have registry numbers and even barcodes. So if you are issued 12 bullets, they know which ones, and how many you actually used.
This is why you go to train with the army or marines. You keep your issues bullets in a bag, and use the less regulated ones. The only barcodes are the ones you make with brrt.