Whether law enforcement should tap our phones on the condition that a warrant is obtained is, at the very least, worthy of public discussion. Signal has unilaterally decided for us all.
HOLY SHIT. Bwhahahaha.
Instead, we have a technologically driven shift of power to ideological individuals and organizations whose lack of appreciation for moral nuance and good governance puts us all at risk.
As you said about it only going one way...it's fine if private companies have ideology in one direction, but the other way is BAD. It's fine if companies team up with the government to violate people's rights en masse, but saying you don't want that to be possible or it might happen (which it never does, disregard that it is happening) you're an evil conspiracy theorist.
No, technically they're saying Gubmint should be able to monitor, with a warrant, because Democracy, or something.
The government spying on you is the will of the people. Anyone providing privacy that would make it harder for the government to spy on its users is Bad.
HOLY SHIT. Bwhahahaha.
As you said about it only going one way...it's fine if private companies have ideology in one direction, but the other way is BAD. It's fine if companies team up with the government to violate people's rights en masse, but saying you don't want that to be possible or it might happen (which it never does, disregard that it is happening) you're an evil conspiracy theorist.
No, technically they're saying Gubmint should be able to monitor, with a warrant, because Democracy, or something.
The government spying on you is the will of the people. Anyone providing privacy that would make it harder for the government to spy on its users is Bad.
Remember, it's (D)ifferent when they do it.